Nightowl

I wonder what you guys meaning of all of this, LiveGuard was introduced probably because there was need for 0-day protection and also Smart Security lacked something special that differs it from Internet Security
The complaint here is that LiveGuard does take 1-10 minutes inorder to process what has been sent to Cloud and with that time it's blocked till it gets approved by ESET, even also as been reported that Signed files are even reported and uploaded, Let's not forget that before a while there was an article about Microsoft signing drivers which in the end was a malware
LiveGuard is a kind of sandbox analysis server that is available for Smart Security products, which is normal thing for a sandbox to take time to process and analyze and send back information, there was a complaint before that LiveGrid doesn't block/prevent because it didn't have an update for a kind of file/threat , now that what LiveGuard is doing , it's blocking a file that it never seen before , which what people requested in order to prevent never seen before Ransomware files
For sure a new feature , it would contain bugs and need to be fixed and optimized more and so the servers are , even if one will go and have EDTD and one endpoint for it , it would take the same amount of time for analysis
And probably LiveGuard is powered by EDTD so would be same same.
LiveGuard is very nice addition by ESET , it can be fixed and optimized more for sure and I believe by the time passes it's database will be bigger and better, it's still the first public version for it , but for the question to use it or not , well Internet Security is still there if answer is not.

I wonder what you guys meaning of all of this, LiveGuard was introduced probably because there was need for 0-day protection and also Smart Security lacked something special that differs it from Internet Security
The complaint here is that LiveGuard does take 1-10 minutes inorder to process what has been sent to Cloud and with that time it's blocked till it gets approved by ESET, even also as been reported that Signed files are even reported and uploaded, Let's not forget that before a while there was an article about Microsoft signing drivers which in the end was a malware
LiveGuard is a kind of sandbox analysis server that is available for Smart Security products, which is normal thing for a sandbox to take time to process and analyze and send back information, there was a complaint before that LiveGrid doesn't block/prevent because it didn't have an update for a kind of file/threat , now that what LiveGuard is doing , it's blocking a file that it never seen before , which what people requested in order to prevent never seen before Ransomware files
For sure a new feature , it would contain bugs and need to be fixed and optimized more and so the servers are , even if one will go and have EDTD and one endpoint for it , it would take the same amount of time for analysis
And probably LiveGuard is powered by EDTD so would be same same.
LiveGuard is very nice addition by ESET , it can be fixed and optimized more for sure and I believe by the time passes it's database will be bigger and better, it's still the first public version for it , but for the question to use it or not , well Internet Security is still there if answer is not.

ESET is likely being killed by the aggressive Xiaomi battery optimizer.
Please see https://dontkillmyapp.com/xiaomi for instructions how to create an exception.

Hello Peter,
I've sent you the logs as a Private Message
Please check
Thank you.

I would like to reply here as a request for more better GUI for the Linux edition and support for MATE desktop as still I cannot see or use the GUI
Please ESET! , I have around multiple Linux devices that I don't want them to be managed by cloud or ESET center/protect
 
Thanks.

I'm not angry about you reporting it. Quite the contrary, we are happy if you report us possible malicious samples or urls.
I just wanted you to point in the right direction, ie. to report stuff directly to samples[at]eset.com according to the KB if you want the submission to receive better attention.
Also I wanted to point out that even if a particular website is not blocked (ie. it may be a completely legitimate one with just somebody posting links to cracks), the point is to detect possible threat in the end no matter how it is achieved, ie. by blocking access to the malicious website or by detecting the malware upon download or execution at latest.

Hello,

Just to follow up since I've been out of the office, CVE-2021-40444 is currently detected as DOC/TrojanDownloader.Agent.DIC and DOC/TrojanDownloader.Agent.DHY.

For more information, please see ESET Knowledgebase Article # 8122, Does ESET protect me from the Microsoft Windows remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2021-40444?

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Here you can find most of the needed information about configurations :
https://help.eset.com/eis/14/en-US/?beginner.html

Thank you for suggestion. I've tried both in past but prefer using uTorrent. My comment was just meant to show that even non-malicious processes can sometimes be shown in red.

The free version of ZoneAlarm definitely has been using  the Kaspersky engine for a while: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/check-point-zonealarm-free-antivirus-plus .
The paid consumer and enterprise versions use more Kaspersky components: http://svendsen.me/worried-checkpoints-use-kaspersky-products-heres-disable-remove/

Just to note , Checkpoint uses Kaspersky engine hence why they both detect it.

Yes but only existing holders of a NOD32 AV for Linux desktop will be eligible to get it. That said, it won't be possible to use an EAV/EIS/ESSP for Windows license for activation.

You can upload your version to virustotal for more checking by AV engines to be more sure
It seems that this WaasMedic is related to Windows Update.

Version 8.1.3.0
Added: ESET Dynamic Threat Defense support Added: SecureBoot support Added: Process Exclusions Added: Ability to check for update in GUI Added: Ability to copy support-related information from GUI Improved: Warning when product is being activated with an overused license Fixed: Update doesn't work from a mirror created by ESET Mirror Tool Fixed: Device control could block the keyboard and mouse required to log into the system Other bug fixes and minor optimizations New version was released but there is no mention of supporting new kernels , so I doubt your issues are fixed sadly.

Try to clean the browser's data , like cache and stuff, you can also remove that JS manually by removing it from the folder path , or by running a scan ESET should pick it up and remove it
And also try to refrain from using IE , Microsoft is killing that browser and soon will retire and go out.

I believe they are both safe , but ESET would be more safer.
Normally malicious software will target Password Managers of Firefox and Chrome because normally that what everyone uses, ESET could be more protected against this type of attacks and more safer to use.

Hello @Alex C,
you are welcome, credit does to our dev team as the whole analysis was done by them.
Keeping thing up to date is for sure recommended...
Peter

It's still same ESMC but with a different name and a new version.
About reverting back , I don't know an ESET Staff could help more in this , but you can backup the server incase something wrong happens.

Thank for reply.
May got to switch to GNOME to show the user interface.

Thanks for that itman , I was trying to remember the name of O&O software , I completely forgot about it and Cortana drove me crazy recently , trying to disable it every way I can , but Cortana is mighty keeps resurrecting itself haha
Thanks!

I am having same trouble with MATE desktop , I believe MATE is like Cinnamon they aren't supported unfortunately
If you switch to GNOME , the GUI will work normally , but I hate GNOME.

Yes they will be added , you have the remaining time of the current license and the added renewed time over it but make sure to renew the same username

I missed the *soon* part, thanks!

It's not yet supported that's why you cannot use it
 

It's not yet supported that's why you cannot use it