Jump to content

Mirek S.

ESET Staff
  • Content Count

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Kudos

  1. Upvote
    Mirek S. received kudos from Peter Randziak in MDM https requirements   
    Hello,
    Those requirements are there mainly because iOS devices as we use built-in iOS. What iOS devices accept as trusted differs per iOS version and we described _most_ restrictive rules which should work always. (There are other requirements like RSA2048+, SHA256+ etc... for iOS described elsewhere in documentation)
    So in the end Your certificate may work (it will definitely work for Android devices), however when Apple brings some update to their trust validation it might stop working.
    HTH,
    M.
  2. Upvote
    Mirek S. received kudos from Peter Randziak in ERROR WHILE INITIALIZING CONFIGURATION EDITOR.: (TYPEERROR) : ((INTERMEDIATE VALUE)(INTERMEDIATE VALUE) , K).INITCONFIGEDITOR IS NOT A FUNCTION   
    Hello,
    We checked multiple browsers to identify which one produces this error (seems like you posted chrome error), However for future reference (and potentional improvement) can you please answer following?
    browser(s) (in case of IE ideally export security settings for security zone console is in) - you already said you tried multiple, however platform/browser still matters for reproduction. webconsole behind reverse proxy/application firewall ESET (or other) product with TLS filtering enabled installed on computer connecting to console Any "uncommon" setup you can think of This issue can arise in case _some_ https requests on same site (in this case as Pavel said seems like js script) is blocked from download. Which in case of TLS (to my knowledge) requires MITM interception (product/WAF/RP/actual attack) or extremely restrictive browser rules.
    Thanks,
    M.
  3. Upvote
    Mirek S. received kudos from Peter Randziak in ERROR WHILE INITIALIZING CONFIGURATION EDITOR.: (TYPEERROR) : ((INTERMEDIATE VALUE)(INTERMEDIATE VALUE) , K).INITCONFIGEDITOR IS NOT A FUNCTION   
    Hello,
    It's possible CloudFlare incorrectly caches some parts of configuration editor and returns out-of-date data causing this. Please create HAR log @PavelP mentioned it might help us determine whether issue is with CloudFlare or webconsole itself.
    Ideal would be to have tomcat access log paired with this log to determine which requests made it to server and which did not.
    Thanks.
  4. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to MichalJ in Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator   
    @andy_s We will track this as an improvement request, towards the future versions. Issue is, that the "upgrade" itself is handled by Endpoint (in case you execute scan and select option "shutdown after scan"), and Endpoint does not initiate agent wakeup to report scan completion. It simply triggers shutdown, before the result is replicated.
    Maybe, if you are willing to, can you explain why are you shutting down the machines? Is it to save power over weekends, or? As there might be different way how to achieve that. One that will report "success" would be a run command, with a respective windows shutdown / with delay, as task would report "Success" not in the moment of task execution, but on the moment when it contacted WMI provider with the command the reboot. If system acknowledged, it will report success.  Also, out of curiosity, what is your replication interval?
  5. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to Kieran Barry in Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator   
    Description: Enable right-click and double-click in ERA
    Detail: ERA is one of the most easy-to-use management services I have used. However i believe that to make it more ergonomical there should be a functionality that lets users double-click on something. For example, when wanting to generate a report you first have to click on the report, then go down to the "GENERATE NOW" button and click that. I feel like adding the ability to open reports and other things with a simple double-click action would improve accessibility.
    The right-click I admit is quite an odd suggestion seeing as if you click on a field once it brings up a menu etc, however, again for things like editing reports, you first have to click the report, then click on the little cog icon over to the far right, and then click on edit. Would it not be easier just to be able to right click the report and choose edit?
     
    A very pedantic suggestion I know...
  6. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to Marcos in EFS 7.0.12014.0 - MSSQL ERROR   
    It's not a problem. The only reason why it occurs with v7 is that older version didn't support protected service, a security feature of Windows. In v7 it's possible to disable protected service at the cost of worsening protection, however, it wouldn't be worse than with v6.5 which didn't support it yet. With v7 you get also ransomware shield which can proactively protect the server from encryption by ransomware.
  7. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to Beech Horn in EFS 7.0.12014.0 - MSSQL ERROR   
    That line looks like the example from:
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/hardware/code-signing/dn756632(v=vs.85)#user-mode-and-kernel-mode-code-troubleshooting
    With the signing levels being:
    0x0: Unchecked 0x1: Unsigned 0x2: Enterprise 0x3: Custom 1 0x4: Authenticode 0x5: Custom 2 0x6: Store 0x7: Custom 3 / Antimalware 0x8: Microsoft 0x9: Custom 4 0xa: Custom 5 0xb: Dynamic Code Generation 0xc: Windows 0xd: Windows Protected Process Light 0xe: Windows TCB 0xf: Custom 6 It looks like you are requesting all DLLs to be higher than (or more likely equal to) 0x7 (Antimalware) and this DLL is actually 0x1 (Unsigned).
    THE FOLLOWING IS THEORY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE
    To me, it looks like NOD32 is loading the DLLs into its own service when running as a Protected Service rather than scanning them without loading it into memory in a manner unlike a library (e.g. without running the code or injecting the DLL into the service).
    On top of this sqlnclir11.rll should be reported as 0x8 instead of 0x1 by Microsoft, which is in itself a problem.
    If we look at 0x4 (Authenticode) this would also trigger that error but could be legitimate signed code which gets blocked due to the way NOD32 is scanning when running as a Protected Service.
  8. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to Marcos in EFS 7.0.12014.0 - MSSQL ERROR   
    There is no way to solve it if Microsoft doesn't update the rll file with one with a valid signature except disabling Protected service in the HIPS setup which would enable unsigned dll files to be loaded in ekrn.exe. Of course, that would be a security hole and unnecessary risk so we don't recommend disabling protected service.
  9. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to Marcos in <resource-not-found-0x120000ef> alerts after ERA RA to ESMC 7 migration   
    You must have an older v6.6 installed (6.6.0.0 – 6.6.2063 are affected) so upgrade to v7 will surely fix it and the notice will go away then.
  10. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to AGH1965 in As soon as possible option of Scheduler   
    Here some more results:
    If consecutive scheduled daily scans can't run at the scheduled time, then the scan will only be done as soon as possible if the previous scan was at least 23 hours ago. If that is not the case yet, then EIS will wait until it is.
    If consecutive scheduled weekly scans can't run at the scheduled time, then the scan will only be done as soon as possible if the previous scan was at least 6 days and 23 hours ago. If that is not the case yet, then EIS will wait until it is.
    In my opinion this is not how it should be! 
    For example: A scan is scheduled to run every Monday at 00:00:00, but it doesn't get the chance to run at that time. The computer isn't booted any earlier than Wednesday 20:00:00, but almost directly after booting the missed scan is executed. The next week again there is no chance to run the scan at the scheduled time, but now the computer is booted on Monday at 08:00:00. I would expect the scan to run then almost directly after booting, because it is scheduled to run every Monday at 00:00:00 and in this case 08:00:00 is as soon as possible, but instead EIS decides to wait until Wednesday 19:00:00, which is 6 days and 23 hours after the previous scan. In other words, if there is never a chance to run the scan at the scheduled time, then it will take many weeks to get the scan running on Monday again, because the time will only be advanced 1 hour a week.
  11. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to LCS in Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator   
    Agreed. I even thought about the programming logistics of that when I posted it, but as the forum is about suggestions, I thought what the heck, let's put it in, as it is a nice idea (IMO) 
    Andy
  12. Upvote
    Mirek S. gave kudos to itman in Migration from ESET to another antivirus   
    You might want to refer to this latest A-V Comparatives Endpoint test and resign yourself to living with the issue of high false positives as far as TrendMicro is concerned: https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-march-april-2019-factsheet/
×
×
  • Create New...