Jump to content

rugk

Most Valued Members
  • Content Count

    1,716
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    54

rugk last won the day on August 20 2017

rugk had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About rugk

  • Rank
    Expert

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany
  • Interests
    ESET of course :)

Recent Profile Visitors

4,064 profile views
  1. Rather avoid PMs. Here is the official way how to report security issues: https://www.eset.com/int/security-vulnerability-reporting/
  2. There are other ad blockers of course, e.g. uBlock Origin: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/
  3. https://store.esetme.com/currently shows a 404 error here.
  4. Maybe he wanted to bump this topic... In any case: Is there any new news? (How) will DESLock be integrated into ESET products or is it even integrated in some products I don't know of?
  5. You could try to install an older version. Unfortunately it is not available for Linux on the usual site, but probably ESET can give you a link to an older version if you contact the support.
  6. What operation system do you use? I am quite certain you do not use Linux (as EAV v9 is e.g. not available for Linux), so an admin might move this thread.
  7. Really? So this is ridiculous of them, because how does not copying/pasting and not being able to screenshot something makes your banking more secure? Yes, exactly in no way. Yes, because everything else would be useless. Basically it uses your default browser (in contrast to other solutions, which may use a separate browser) and creates a new profile, which separates your usual browser from the browsing in banking mode. When you end banking mode, all data is removed. That's all, but I think it is at least more useful than preventing users from copying stuff.
  8. Actually if you look at the SSLLabs scan the site does support SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 up to TLS 1.2. That's why a cli8ent can connect to it using a higher protocol version. Of course the site should not support SSL 3.0, but that must be reported to the site owners. To really test whether ESETs SSL scanning (or any other thing such as browsers or other Man-in-the-middle software) is vulnerable to Poodle (that's how the attack using SSL 3.0 as a fallback is called) you can use this test site: https://www.poodletest.com/ As for ESET I've already proposed the option to being able to disable
  9. Exactly this seems to be the case. Actually this is a very good thing of the add-on, but in your particular case it is of course unwanted. So basically one has to decide between ESET HTTPS scanning and using the VPN add-on. Always note that any files arriving on your disk are still scanned by ESET, so it is not too bad to disable HTTPS scanning unless you use features such as parental control.
  10. Does disabling Firewall/SSL scanning/web protection help? (Try it one by one, please.)
  11. I doubt this is an issue with ESET SSL scanning as it indeed should intercept all traffic and in this case the certificate would be valid. So generally: Click on "No" when such a popup appears. It's bad enough that IE let's you click through such a message so easily. Also how do you get the AT&T bar there. It seems you are on Yahoo.com and the site is a HTTPS site, so there should be nothing from AT&T. Is your internet provider AT&T by instance? If so they are intercepting your traffic. When visiting Yahoo.com: Was there a similar error message, which had something to do with
×
×
  • Create New...