persian-boy

Bug after bug and this issue did not exist in version 10! I'm quite sure about it

Eset the ask rule for start new application is buggy and doesn't work in the right way! I have Aimp player in C:\Program Files (x86)\AIMP and when I double click Aimp.exe then Hips tell me explorer.exe want to access Aimp player ok? But if I start a music(MP3) from somewhere(consider Aipm player is default media player)then the Aimp.exe will run AND I can see it in process list but the hips won't alert me about it! Marcos I'm waiting for the answers and you have to answer me:P I'm guessing that's because Hips won't work on audio and video formats??

suggestion: Separate export and import settings or Hips

If I run smth as the Smart screen and already have allowed rules for the smart screen then my rules(like ask rule for start new application)will ignore and Eset let the file run without any alert!why is that? I have 2 rules: Allow everything For smart screen(i meant all operations) and the ASk rule for all application(start the new app and MODIFY state of another... ) Shouldn't HIPS alert me about the start new application since I have the ask rule for it?

Whats the job of system cleaner?it telling me several system settings have been changed!and they are 4 changes. But cant show me what are these changes?and I cant blindly press reset. Can Eset provide more details?

I appreciated your work!the new version is lighter than before :-) there are only 2 Avs that I found them light in resources first is Eset and the second is Q360 others suck.

Sometimes when I start the ESET SysInspector from the GUI then Hips will alert for it and the access that SysInspector want! it's not that important but pls consider to learn Hips don't catch your stuff:D

This is Sad! not even one new feature for Hips?-.- An option to let me whitelist cmd commands?or a purge button for not existing rules?I'm done with you Eset:D

Yes, i did and im sure there is a bug but NVM. I noticed Eset updated the Hips module version but the question is what are these changes? Eset pls provide a change log or some information about these changes? the user needs to know what is happening.

I know its hard to believe but sometimes The Hips get bypass:/ I'm running it in interactive plus these rules: Actions=askOperation affecting: ApplicationsApplication operation: start new applicationAapplcaition=all applications Example:2 weeks ago I ran Splash player pro and Hips allow it without asking! but after that, I clicked on it again and Hips show me an alert! I noticed sometimes it won't Show the alerts In the right way and allow without asking!this happened more than 10 times in 2 months!there are some hidden problems -.-

Working for me.maybe you need to change the browser

4 gig ram and corei3 CPU here! but I can't feel anything. Eset made things easier:P

He is saying the Android screen is locked by Eset and the password doesn't work.

That alert isn't only about the music player it's happening for the browser as well and I guess there are some bugs in HIPS but Eset needs to fix them as soon as possible. But from what is see sometimes this option allows everything (maybe a bug or smth like that) Yes using hips in interactive mode need a lot of knowledge about the windows but I'm not idiot and can read alerts:D Mate, I'm not using learning more anymore I just removed my rules and start using interactive from the start because the learning mode is broken and it may allow smth that I don't want. But your suggestion is also good(learning mode and policy mode after like 1 week)

Suggestion: Boot time filter for the firewall to prevent data leak during the system startup. I don't know if you have it already? but if it's not there pls consider it as an important feature thanks.

+1 same here so far so good.

Does it mean the HIPS will allow every access till I exit the process?or it will only allow specific operation and will ask for the next operation(like start a new application or write to disk) Eset answer the questions :-)

Don't you see that bug?look at the photo!HIPS saying Aimp player want to access() what is ()?Eset plssssssss a bit explain about this alert why no one answer? omfg. Also, the target is not visible and When you want to set the permanent rule the filed is empty :D what is this? ITAman I know I don't need to set the ask rules for a media player but I just like to have it.so it should works... Eset pls tell me 2 things: 1-Why Hips in interactive mode will not alert for everything like the ask rule? can I know how this alert system works? 2- What is that alert?

I'm wondering why Eset don't care about this bug!this is happening for the Yandex browser as well! Itman what do you think? dear Marcos, I know you are reading my comments XD pls explain about it!

Thanks for the answer :-) Yes maybe because I'm running it in interactive that's why but I cant try policy mode for now maybe later. Eset I'm still waiting for the answer?what is this alert? XD what does that means?the only one who cares is ITman

Sometimes I have an alert form the Hips for smth but I want to open another file or do smth with windows and for that application or work, I need to answer an alert from the Hips but Eset doesn't show me the next alert till I answer the first alert and this is breaking my work. Why is that?pls fix it and you can also spam my desktop with alerts who care? Also pls look at this photo and tell me what is this?Hips is trolling on my pc because you didn't fix these problems when it was beta.

I'm waiting for the answer *-* and I guess you need to fix it because the way it works is dangerous --_-- P.s: the safe is to press ask every time or create a permanent rule for that operation.otherwise, it will allow everything.

There is a bug:Action:askOperation affecting: all of them(Reg/App/Files)I have the above rules for kerishdoctor.exe so when I start it HIPS ask me about the access for registry by Kerishdoctor and I have 3 choices:1-Ask everytime2-let it access till I exit the program3- Create a permanent rule for this operation(which is access the registry or I can limit it more)If I chose the number 1 it will allow the reg access and ask for the next operation which is ((terminate/suspend another application)) but if I chose the number 2 then Hips will allow every operation for kerishdoctor.exe.I mean it will auto allow other operations as well(like terminate/suspend another application)! when it should only allow the access for registry and don't auto allow other operations...!Eset what is the meaning of the remember until application quit? shouldn't it only allow for current operation and ask about other operations?Someone pls explain about it! in my opinion, this is wrong and broken.

I know about SRP and smart screen also using a tool call https://github.com/AndyFul/Hard_Configurator but I wanted to do that with Eset. Just give a try to this tool because its unbeatable:D

Actions=ask Operation affecting: Applications Application operation: start new application Aapplcaition=all applications Is it the rule you mentioned?