filips
ESET Staff-
Posts
160 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
filips last won the day on July 10 2018
filips had the most liked content!
About filips
-
Rank
Newbie
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Slovakia
-
Mail Security Exchange ignores hidden Mailboxes
filips replied to tese23's topic in ESET Products for Windows Servers
EMSX v10 should be available in q1 2023 -
Peter Randziak reacted to a post in a topic: Mail Security Exchange ignores hidden Mailboxes
-
Mail Security Exchange ignores hidden Mailboxes
filips replied to tese23's topic in ESET Products for Windows Servers
Hi tese23, this behavior will change in EMSX v10 - mailboxes with (msExchHideFromAddressLists = TRUE) will be displayed -
Edge servers are not part of Active Directory forest - they use Active Directory Lightweight Directory Services. Quarantine reports are not supported because the information about users/recipients is very limited. If you have another Exchange server in domain, maybe you could install EMSX on it and add it to ESET cluster as master node?
-
Hi raimund, Attachment type rules are evaluated on all files in archives - zipped document with macro will be caught by the rule (unless it's password protected). Rules support only comparing of static strings so it is not possible to compare From: and Return-Path: headers. Not a perfect solution, but something like this should do the job: From Header - display name contains one of [@customer1.com, @customer2.com] Message headers do not match regular expression "\nReply-To: .*(@customer1.com|customer2.com)"
-
filips reacted to a post in a topic: How to deal with display name spoofing, when contains right mailadress also in reply, but "name@abc.com" is different
-
Issues with logging of Scheduled Scans
filips replied to RichardW's topic in ESET Products for Windows Servers
Hi Richard, There is a known bug in creation of new log files (wrong file number generation) that causes new log files to not be created. As a temporary workaround we suggest removing all old scan logs. -
Peter Randziak reacted to a post in a topic: Cycled antispam
-
Hi yardstudio, Releasing of spam from mail quarantine should work even if you don't report the false positive. The message is resent using replay directory and antispam is not evaluated again. If the email was marked as spam again, it means that it was routed through SMTP agent and tested for spam again - this is not the usual case. Do you have more Exchange servers in your environment? If yes can you describe routing of mail? Information about delivery of the message can be seen in "Received" headers (in the detail dialog) of the message that returned to quarantine. Please post the "Received" headers. BTW, which version of EMSX do you use?
-
espkiller reacted to a post in a topic: EFS 7.0.12014.0 - MSSQL ERROR
-
olsheset reacted to a post in a topic: Mail security 6, Spam rules dont apply for incoming email for quarantine mailbox?
-
Of course you can create separate mailbox, but it's not necessary. EMSX skips scanning of emails going to the address set as quarantined mailbox in advanced setup. It should be enough to give the shared mailbox 2 addresses, e.g. info@ and quarantine@. Then set @quarantine as quarantine mailbox in advanced setup (so only emails going to @quarantine are skipped).
-
The antispam engine will be disabled competely. We are already releasing new Mailserver module that disables the antispam engine to prevent more serious errors that could occur after April 1st. We prepared a KB article with details, you can find it at https://support.eset.com/kb7118/ Yes, anti-malware will work correctly
-
filips reacted to a post in a topic: SPF Checking in Mail Security for Exchange v7
-
SharePoint not accessible issue
filips replied to jinlei801011's topic in ESET Products for Windows Servers
Hi, Try executing "SHPIO13.exe displaystructure" under the same account as provided to our product. Are there any errors?