Jump to content

Veremo

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Veremo

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Poland

Recent Profile Visitors

685 profile views
  1. VT says 1fa45104b40630d08b83513cd2424ab72d79b0e1 was signed by Dexon Software. Additionally this file contains timestamp countersignature which proofs it is not "recent" Date signed 11:53 PM 11/30/2005
  2. This file is genuine Windows file. It is signed by Microsoft and seen on many computers in the world (hxxp://whitelisting.kaspersky.com/advisor#search/8a511a096bb626405f760d432abbfae6a0870c8c) You can't blindly believe online services showing you some indicators.. If they were so good, there would be no space in the market for proper AVs
  3. Is there a version of the FreeFileSync installer without advertisements?
  4. It seems that ESET is the only top vendor protecting his customers from very beginning: https://virustotal.com/pl/file/bc24c76f1f5ed878104eb9e747715c4117f6dc9fcdab8b30cd5a5780f99dedad/analysis/1462200411/ Yes, the detection is correct and was confirmed by ESET viruslab ZoneAlarm server was not hacked, PUA file is signed by Check Point Software Technologies Ltd
  5. Obviously NOD32 is able to detect macro viruses
  6. Maybe it will give you some hint: hxxp://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=16345
  7. OK, I probably misunderstood you: When I read it first time I believed you think it is possible to make reversing w/o access to the code, but it seems that you were talking about proper unpacking PS. submit incorrectly detected file to the ESET viruslab
  8. Some of User's statements are incorrect but in general he is right and it is expected to see cracks/keygens/patchers detected by ESET as unsafe applications. If something is detected as a trojan or virus, is probably NOT a crack/keygen but malware/virus
  9. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" Windows executable files have complicated format. If file does not follow this format (ie. was truncated, some parts overwritten) it can't run and is corrupted. Adding detection for corrupted files is useless. It causes increase of virus db without any gain. Bigger virus db means bigger RAM consumption, longer update, slower scanning.
  10. If ESET says something is bad, it is. Deal with it "You also understand that feytools.com cannot and does not guarantee or warrant that files available for downloading through the Site will be free of infection or viruses, worms, Trojan horses or other code that manifest contaminating or destructive properties" hxxp://www.feytools.com/feytools-web-site-agreement/
  11. My observation - when you send really malicious file your submission is resolved quickly, when you send not malicious/corrupted/useless file - it gets low priority and you often get no answer.
  12. hxxp://www.opswat.com/about/media/reports/antivirus-january-2014
  13. I think big difference is detection and cleaning of viruses. Only more advanced products can deal with polymorphic file infectors. ESET can do it, MB - can't.
  14. Partnering with external company means advocating their solution and being blamed for partner mistakes. I don't think ESET should do that in times of surveillance. Arakasi - "Backup and Restore was deprecated in the most recent versions of Windows" (hxxp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backup_and_Restore)
×
×
  • Create New...