Shiv 0 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 Hi there, I was triaging network connectivity issue on my ERA server and noticed that my server stops accepting new connections because of a bad file descriptor. I noticed that a new stability patch would probably fix the issue and was released however, the module upgrade task doesn't seem to respond to that task. My ESET Security Management Center (Server), is 7.0.471.0. 1. How do I resolve this? 2. How do manually initiated a module upgrade on the server without going through the webconsole? Logs below: 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: Kernel [Thread 7f9a750f6740]: Started module AuthenticationModule (used -792 KB) 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: Kernel [Thread 7f9a750f6740]: Starting module CEncryptionModule 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Resolving ip address: 10.15.0.247 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Receiving ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Successfully received ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Socket accepted. Remote ip address: 10.15.0.247 remote port: 9679 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Resolving ip address: 10.15.0.247 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Receiving ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Successfully received ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Forcibly closing sessionId:13, isClosing:0 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Removing session 13 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Closing connection , session id:13 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Socket accepted. Remote ip address: 10.15.0.247 remote port: 9681 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Resolving ip address: 10.15.0.247 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3d7fa700]: Receiving ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Resolving ip address: 10.15.0.247 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Receiving ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Successfully received ip address: 10.15.0.247 from cache 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a3cff9700]: Socket accepted. Remote ip address: 10.15.0.247 remote port: 9683 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: Kernel [Thread 7f9a750f6740]: Started module CEncryptionModule (used 0 KB) 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: Kernel [Thread 7f9a750f6740]: Used memory after modules start-up is 164312 KB 2019-02-21 23:09:01 Information: CDataMinersModule [Thread 7f9a3e7fc700]: CFunctionalityLogDataMiner: Scheduled first publishing of functionality logs with 5s delay 2019-02-21 23:09:02 Error: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a27fff700]: remote_endpoint: Bad file descriptor 2019-02-21 23:09:03 Error: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a27fff700]: remote_endpoint: Bad file descriptor 2019-02-21 23:09:05 Error: NetworkModule [Thread 7f9a27fff700]: remote_endpoint: Bad file descriptor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESET Staff MartinK 376 Posted February 22, 2019 ESET Staff Share Posted February 22, 2019 7 hours ago, Shiv said: 1. How do I resolve this? 2. How do manually initiated a module upgrade on the server without going through the webconsole? This is most probably caused by limits set in your Linux system. Please verify limit for open files in your system, or limits for services in case systemd is used. In case you are using ESMC Appliance, please check following forum topic: Peter Randziak 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiv 0 Posted February 22, 2019 Author Share Posted February 22, 2019 Hi there, Thanks for the response. Upping the limit worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts