Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The article I read stated that Eset replied with the exploits and bypasses disclosed were old and had been patched year ago.

On the other hand, a dedicated state actor can "blow through" any conventional security protection if they so wish. Many times via an "inside hack." Remember Stuxnet?

Posted

Good, I was worried that Eset didn't knew about the security holes.

Posted
1 hour ago, itman said:

The article I read stated that Eset replied with the exploits and bypasses disclosed were old and had been patched year ago.

On the other hand, a dedicated state actor can "blow through" any conventional security protection if they so wish. Many times via an "inside hack." Remember Stuxnet?

Care to share the link to the article that you read

  • Most Valued Members
Posted
2 hours ago, MartinPe said:

Good, I was worried that Eset didn't knew about the security holes.

If anything it shows the importance of newer versions. Yes I know a lot of people aren't always keen on change and dislike when designs change but sometimes it's best just to update. There seems to still be people who think Microsoft should update an old aging os aka xp.

  • Most Valued Members
Posted

itman,

Thanks for the link. Interesting read and a interesting site.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...