Dmytro Piatnytsia 0 Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 Dobrý den, Řešení Esetu nepoužíváme, ale máme problém s odesíláním e-mailů klientům.Od těch, kteří používají Eset, dostáváme zpětnou zprávu: m1-u7-mx.websupport.sk Remote Server returned '554 5.7.1 Rejected by ESETS_SMFI (spam)' Původní hlavičky zprávy: Received: from COSMOSEX01.local.hotel-cosmopolitan.cz (172.40.40.20) by COSMOSEX01.local.hotel-cosmopolitan.cz (172.40.40.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:59:34 +0200 Received: from COSMOSEX01.local.hotel-cosmopolitan.cz ([fe80::9c01:eefa:4816:40dc]) by COSMOSEX01.local.hotel-cosmopolitan.cz ([fe80::9c01:eefa:4816:40dc%12]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 18:59:34 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?S3Jpc3TDvW5hIEJlcmFub3bDoQ==?= <Kristyna.Beranova@hotel-cosmopolitan.cz> To: "olga@sibkraft.com" <olga@sibkraft.com> Subject: RE: rooming - 22.11-24.11.2023 Thread-Topic: rooming - 22.11-24.11.2023 Thread-Index: AQHZ5wJ/IHjV9HCXJkWjq4fIircbqLAaP7JQgAAAL/CAAEsEAA== Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:59:34 +0000 Message-ID: <aec87fed3fc24733a91e129d45a28e6e@hotel-cosmopolitan.cz> References: <f11b0b0999984a41a0b4b8bfff427117@hotel-imperial.cz> <4910714249.20230914103524@sibkraft.com> <e4cf455e68e6460892d008b82184d41d@hotel-imperial.cz> <213489164.20230914135619@sibkraft.com> <5c3c86cb19dd4bdd8e41dfa827b2a8d1@hotel-imperial.cz> In-Reply-To: <5c3c86cb19dd4bdd8e41dfa827b2a8d1@hotel-imperial.cz> Accept-Language: cs-CZ, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.40.40.1] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_008_aec87fed3fc24733a91e129d45a28e6ehotelcosmopolitancz_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Jelikož nejsme zákazníky Esetu, nemám možnost kontaktovat podporu. Můžete mi poradit, jak to vyřešit ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Solution Marcos 4,844 Posted September 15 Administrators Solution Share Posted September 15 Dane IP adresy uz nie su na blackliste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmytro Piatnytsia 0 Posted September 15 Author Share Posted September 15 Dobře, děkuji, vyzkouším to. E-maily z našeho hotelu už byly několikrát v blacklistu, můžete mi poradit, jak se tomu blokování vyhnout? Někdy to zdržuje komunikaci s klientem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stano1 0 Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Dobrý deň, máme rovnaký problém s nedoručovaním mailov. Posielam vrátený mail: This is the mail system at host wes1-so1.wedos.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system <turza@esko.sk>: host mailin1.esko.sk[45.13.137.9] said: 554 5.7.1 Rejected by ESETS_SMFI (spam) (in reply to end of DATA command) Reporting-MTA: dns; wes1-so1.wedos.net X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 4Rt2vB65Vwz2fQ X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; vlajky@vlajky.online Arrival-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; turza@esko.sk Original-Recipient: rfc822;turza@esko.sk Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: dns; mailin1.esko.sk Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.7.1 Rejected by ESETS_SMFI (spam) Hlavička mailu: Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: vlajky@vlajky.online Received: from wes1-mx8.wedos.net ([10.36.200.5]) by wes1-im1.wedos.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id Hzr7DDunDmXzyQAA30M1fw for <vlajky@vlajky.online>; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:52:11 +0200 Received-SPF: none (wes1-so1.wedos.net: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=wes1-mx8-0.wes1-mx8.hosting.svc.cluster.local; identity=helo; helo=wes1-so1.wedos.net; client-ip=46.28.106.43 Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by wes1-mx8.wedos.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rt2vC6CSHzPjfc for <vlajky@vlajky.online>; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wes1-so1.wedos.net (Postfix) id 4Rt2vC4xKRz6d6; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:52:07 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON@wes1-so1.wedos.net (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: vlajky@vlajky.online Auto-Submitted: auto-replied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="4Rt2vB65Vwz2fQ.1695459127/wes1-so1.wedos.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <4Rt2vC4xKRz6d6@wes1-so1.wedos.net> X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 X-Rspamd-Server: wes1-mx8-0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Rt2vC6CSHzPjfc X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 10.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_DN_EQ_ADDR(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.31)[ip: (-9.62), ipnet: 46.28.104.0/21(-4.57), asn: 197019(-2.30), country: CZ(-0.08)]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain,multipart/mixed]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-3.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; LOCAL_FUZZY_SPAM(0.00)[11:99019785e7:0.56:txt]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[wedos.net]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[1:+,3:~,4:+,5:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:197019, ipnet:46.28.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[MAILER-DAEMON@wes1-so1.wedos.net,]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_UNKNOWN(0.10)[message/rfc822] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,844 Posted September 23 Administrators Share Posted September 23 Na zaklade hlaviciek sa email aktualne nedeteguje ako spam. Ak by problem pretrvaval, poslite mi testovaci email v eml alebo msg formate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.