LTL 0 Posted September 15, 2020 Share Posted September 15, 2020 Hello, I could not understand the meanings of the events in my log file: "Cannot unblock removable media (org.freedesktop.udisk2.filesystem-mount)". What does it mean? I did not mount any removable media. Linux system I am using was installed directly into a partition of my hard drive. Please see the attached snapshot of my log file. Thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 5,070 Posted September 16, 2020 Administrators Share Posted September 16, 2020 Most likely removable media blocking doesn't work due to changes in the PolicyKit framework. You can only ignore the message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTL 0 Posted September 16, 2020 Author Share Posted September 16, 2020 Where the removable media came from? Is my system safe? Thank you very much for your responding to my message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 5,070 Posted September 16, 2020 Administrators Share Posted September 16, 2020 There is a functionality to block removable media access in the product. It probably doesn't work which is why the message is logged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Most Valued Members Nightowl 202 Posted September 18, 2020 Most Valued Members Share Posted September 18, 2020 (edited) AppArmor prevents ESET from entering protected areas that are supposed to be accessible only by specific processes ESET didn't configure v4 to work with AppArmor , it's better that you re-configure the logs options to remove faster because it will keep generating logs , because that error will be generated every a bit , also with the cannot read from socket I believe it's safer to keep V4 blocked from accessing sensitive areas as that's is more safe that to let it access because v4 isn't being updated like it's Windows / Mac brothers. Edited September 18, 2020 by Nightowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTL 0 Posted September 18, 2020 Author Share Posted September 18, 2020 Sorry, I don't know what you are talking about. I am not using AppArmor, so it's not my fault since I do not know where does it come from either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Most Valued Members Nightowl 202 Posted September 20, 2020 Most Valued Members Share Posted September 20, 2020 (edited) On 9/18/2020 at 9:30 PM, LTL said: Sorry, I don't know what you are talking about. I am not using AppArmor, so it's not my fault since I do not know where does it come from either. Most Linux distributions uses AppArmor or SELinux. Quote AppArmor is a Linux kernel security module that allows the system administrator to restrict programs' capabilities with per-program profiles. Profiles can allow capabilities like network access, raw socket access, and the permission to read, write, or execute files on matching paths. Quote Security-Enhanced Linux is a Linux kernel security module that provides a mechanism for supporting access control security policies, including mandatory access controls. SELinux is a set of kernel modifications and user-space tools that have been added to various Linux distributions. Edited September 20, 2020 by Nightowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts