cyberhash
-
Posts
728 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
30
Posts posted by cyberhash
-
-
@foneil I was referring to the under the hood ones.
I think people were expecting more than just an updated GUI and a referral program after waiting a year, which is what the release notes imply. -
There are actually plenty of changes in the new version, many more than the (4) that is listed against the changelog that is shown against 12.0.27.0
Maybe once the discrepancy in the changelog is noticed and updated then you might be more satisfied ?
@Marcos @Peter Randziak
-
Yes ...... I use it myself and it runs without any issue
-
You added that to the "exclude from scanning" list yeah ??
Using the format *www.sportshd.me* , using those asterisks -
-
You could always exclude the site from being scanned/blocked yourself in your settings *AT YOUR OWN RISK*
-
-
Version 11.2.63.0
- Fixed: Webcam is not detected by Webcam Protection on Windows 10 RS4
- Fixed: Antitheft Protection crashes during attempt to disable
- Fixed: Issues with Wi-Fi connected to public access point
- Fixed: Debugger not functioning
-
In case you have any problems in the future. The "Troubleshooting Wizard" under SETUP > NETWORK PROTECTION is always a good place to start/look at when trying to resolve network issues ?
-
Honestly you would think after years of the same/similar threads that people would eventually understand that "Tests" don't equate to real world.
It's a very rare occurrence when ESET products actually fails to protect people in "Everyday" use, hence why the forums are nearly devoid of any complaints regarding infection.
The OP and others keep relating to tests but have never fell short of protection themself when using the products.
Unless you get infected with something or fall victim to some kind of ransomware when posting "What If's" is fruitless and misleading to other users.
-
If you go to the Tools menu , then "More Tools" at the bottom right of the window. You can get the security report from there
@camelia
-
15 minutes ago, claudiu said:
I wouldn't so sure: see the detection of Malwarebytes (everything disabled . only Antiransomware protection active )
This is the purpose of "Test Files" : to test a capability .
An answer as " we know that is a test file , that's why we did not detect it" is an insult to a paying user.
Obviously we have different opinions on what this "Simulator" actually does or achieves.
Like i said above, the application needs looked at properly to see if it does "what is advertised" on the label. From what i can see on the screenshots, every test just "encrypts files and deletes the originals". I could do exactly the same thing creating a password protected file using Winrar, which is legitimate. -
6 minutes ago, claudiu said:
This is the convenient answer , to justify failure. The Antiransomware protection on ESET is based on HIPS , which cannot distinguish between a simulator an a real threat (unless the simulator is on a white list)
See here a test with Eicar, another "simulator"
Yet, ESET will detect it as a normal threat.
It's not a convenient answer , its a fact
Eicar is a "test" file that pre-dates any HIPS type system. It's not a simulator.
Never heard of "knowbe4" , the app needs torn apart to see how it works. But i suspect its nonsense that would return the same result when run under any security product......... the old term "Scareware" comes to mind ? -
The answer is in the name ....... It's a "Simulator" = not the real thing
Firefox and chrome both block you from downloading this and on the "KnowBe4" webpage they acknowledge this and tell you how to get "Around" this.
Why would ANY legitimate security vendor have to provide details on how to do this. Im sure they would be in contact with google and mozilla to have it unblocked if it was a mistake.
-
@chrcoluk report the seller to EBAY as they are breaking the T&C's of EBAY
You might get a refund and not be at a total loss -
Buying software on EBAY is a big NO-NO , sadly there are plenty of people quite happy to make money from scamming people.
It's usually the seller that "disappears" before the licence issue arise ? -
1 hour ago, claudiu said:
Funny thing, some rules "allow this and that" are still enabled.
By disabling the firewall , allow "everything" takes place. Not just "this and that"
ESET Firewall and WFC are equally easy to use. WFC is not actually a dedicated firewall and just allows for easier use of windows own firewall.
The firewall within EIS offers botnet and network attack protection and "MIGHT" offer greater protection than windows firewall does by default.
https://support.eset.com/kb318/?viewlocale=en_US -
22 minutes ago, claudiu said:
Any firewall I had so far would mark somehow the invalid rules ( Windows Firewall Control, PC Tools Firewall Plus).
How difficult would be for ESET to implement that.
Yes it's a small annoyance that does not affect functionality, so after uninstalling an program i generally remove the rule i created manually at the same time so i don't end up with a number of redundant rules. -
Firewall rules will still remain and would need to be removed manually
-
3 hours ago, alexander14 said:
That’s is AV gives many detect and sample . Please see page and result . This is important for Eset , how to working to send and result white or black .
Color red -this is good detect , Green - white , or AV not detect and sample to send sample.
Virustotal provides a scan using multiple engines and includes ESET in the results.
Plus anything you may "think" is suspicious , can be submitted to ESET via a few different methods. Via windows explorer (right click and submit for analysis)
Or via email https://support.eset.com/kb141/?locale=en_US&viewlocale=en_US
-
you should unblock that (svchost) using the wizard @hdx1337
-
@jefrotone the issue wont be with you Eset product, but may look like it. Are you running anything like ASUS ai suite or overclocking any of the components on your system ???
Also a bit more info about all "other" software you have installed on your system would help narrow things down a bit -
I'm pretty positive the exact same thing was posted by someone on the forum back in FEB when these results were spotted.
Av-Test seems to be a great source of information. That good it's not ran a test on windows 10 since December 2017
, so i would personally question their overall methodology and reliability.
https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-10/
MSE is never consistent in either its detection or false positives rate, if you scroll through the (Av-Comparatives) chart for the whole of 2017 you will see that. Paid solutions are more consistent , regardless of who the vendor is. -
Hi,
I would select "create rule and remember permanently" and press allow for this, as it's probably a cloud based service malwarebytes uses
, so i would personally question their overall methodology and reliability.
v12.0.27.0 Full Download - Not Online Installer
in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
Posted
https://www.eset.com/int/home/smart-security-premium/download/
And click on advanced options on the right