COStark26
Members-
Posts
207 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
COStark26 last won the day on May 15 2023
COStark26 had the most liked content!
About COStark26
-
Rank
Newbie
Profile Information
-
Location
USA
-
One last attempt & I'll leave you alone .... To do what you did with Win servers .....I'm looking at my AT&T Uverse Gateway data and in the Broadband Tab/Current Internet Connection .... I see Primary and Secondary DNS numbers ... Is THAT what I'd plug into the slots where Quad 9 data had been? ..... Obtain DNS Servers Automatically was my first guess that failed at making a Block.
-
PDF Link @itman just provided .... Interesting 5 Browser Vendors Plan NO Changes .... @ itman, Surely you saw this SO, per Below .... Still No DoH in Browsers Or Windows? Low-tech'ers wouldn't likely conclude that - so the clarification helps.... We reported our observations via the vulnerability disclosure systems to the 6 browser vendors, together with our sugges- tions to better manage the threat of downgrade attacks. We have received responses from all of them except Microsoft Edge........ Among the ones replied, none consider a fix is neces- sary in order to prevent DoH from being attacked. According to the reply from Firefox, that DoH is vulnerable under down- grade attacks is an expected feature of Opportunistic Privacy profile. Firefox believes this setting still protects the users against passive adversaries most of the time. Chrome claims that the issue is the “intended, designed, and documented be- havior” of current Chrome DoH. In fact, Chrome uses plain- text DNS until a DoH resolver can be reliably connected and then upgrade all DNS communications to DoH in opportunis- tic mode. The communication falls back to plaintext DNS if any connection issue happens. For other browsers whose DoH implementation is provided entirely by the Chromium browser engine, the responses are similar or expected to be. While given all browsers follow RFC 8310 [35], which has mentioned the possibility of attacks, it is unsurprising that none of the browsers will make a step to address our attacks. However, we are concerned that the user notification is deliberately ignored and none of the browser vendors plan to adopt it even though the integration into browser UI should incur moderate effort and overhead (e.g., using Notification API [28,31]). We believe users should be put into the decision loop, so they can choose to avoid sensitive communications (e.g., visiting a controversial website) in a hostile environment when necessary.
-
Nitpicky BPP Page Question
COStark26 replied to COStark26's topic in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
Great & Thanks, Marcos. I just assumed X'ing the Icon was to remove BPP & No Green = No BPP ... -
Using Firefox ... Ref the e X icon (below) on BPP page's Far Rt Border ... Once you purposely or accidentally Clk the X and Remove BPP, can you Restore BPP without Close / Re-Open Browser? .... Some guys post they have 50 tabs open at once - Seems they'd go nuts Closing & Re-Open All 50 ... This started when (few times) I accidentally activated the FF Web Developer Tool Module in FF AND amazingly the X to Close the Dev Module is COVERED by ESET's e X Icon. Initially I X'd the BPP Icon, then Dev Tool X = No BPP now .... But discovered FF Menu/ More Tools / Unchk Dev Tool works = 3 Clks. I can easily live with this BUT Wish the BPP e X Icon was placed 2 inches higher OR a way exists to Re-enable BPP after X Off...... What's the reality? Thanks as always.....
-
Problem with VPN
COStark26 replied to BobB's topic in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
By Now you hopefully found the Aus Form, BUT IF No.... My OK attempt - for Australia - Form went like this .... Eset Home Pg / Top Rt - Support Btn / Choose Country = Aus / Support Btn / Choose an Option / Home User/ Other Issue or Feedback / Feedback Other/ Red Btn = No I Still Need Tech Sppt / Form appears .... It's as simple as That! -
Scheduled Scan Not Running
COStark26 replied to dh27564's topic in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
Glad it worked out. I DID NOT have Wake Timer Enabled in Control panel Power Options and THAT seemed to fix my issue. I think I previously Disabled it fighting Sleep waking-up on its own repeatedly. Windows comes on about 20 seconds before the Set Time and No evidence of the app, BUT it did Wake-up. We both learned something. -
Scheduled Scan Not Running
COStark26 replied to dh27564's topic in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
I can't get a "Start a Program" Test of this to work trying - WizTree64.exe - as the Program to start. Can you try a Test Setup Now for 10 minutes later to see if Your Setup works? I realize I don't understand the actual Trigger to wake-up Windows as when I manually dbl-clk -- WizTree64.exe (or any exe) ... I Then MUST OK UAC ... which I don't have a script for in Task Mgr. Does That Delay Computer Wake-up? I don't know. There IS a Box to name Which Windows AND one to chk in the Conditions tab -- Wake-Up Computer - I first did not see - Be sure you chk'd them. Can't miss logic and execution via Task Mgr are two different things as I have shown. Good Luck! -
Scheduled Scan Not Running
COStark26 replied to dh27564's topic in ESET Internet Security & ESET Smart Security Premium
Could you not use Task Scheduler to Wake-up the computer at 7:50 PM to Run an insignificant App and Then let Eset's scheduler run independently at 8 PM? I can't write the necessary Script needed to start App 1 but it seems logical to consider. -
Thanks for the reply, and itman's statement makes sense now after reading the After Update to EIS17 data. I DO get the Green border when clking a BPP shortcut I put in my Taskbar - it didn't sink in at first that the Old Way to define BPP sites was removed and that getting the Green border window from clking a previously named site in a normal Firefox window is gone. I'll use the BPP shortcut and build new shortcuts from within it. Thanks again to you both!