czesetfan

Interesting, still the same condition. Microsoft doesn't distribute this version of the browser?

Interestingly, the reputation is still unknown. Is it really okay? How about you?

The year 2021 was the most financially successful in ESET's history, according to its press release. I hope that maximizing profits will not lead to a discontinuation of the user product line. Optimization has already "buried" the Linux Home edition.

And it also applies to: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\msdt.exe ?

Could you post your HIPS rules configuration related to enabling conhost.exe? (monitoring all script engine startup, allows CompatTelRunner.exe to start PowerShell.exe)

Are these maintenance tasks necessary or dispensable for the smooth operation of Win.

My question is. What will be the impact of not allowing PowerShell.exe -> conhost.exe on the system? That is, if the execution of PowerShell.exe child processes remains blocked, as in ESET's original policy.

Can you specify what maintenance tasks you have in mind? What would be the impact on the system of this blocking?

It looks like 1440.2 has been released. This strange problem is solved. Does it work for everyone?

Sometimes even one is plenty when it's far away. 🙂

I want to wait for the final solution to see if it works. As mentioned above in the discussion it would not be a good idea to manually fix this on multiple computers.

For me, unless I log in, I have a dark theme and I can't even change it. After logging in, I can change the day/night theme with a toggle switch. The light theme "ESET" should be the default.

I hope 1440.1 was not the final solution. Just a quick rollback of the changes for those who haven't managed to update to the problematic module version yet. The promised fix (including the return of counter functionality) will hopefully be out today. We have no comment from Marcos yet on the current status of the workaround.

Even after updating the module to 1440.1 and restarting the PC, the GPU monitor is not visible. :-/

I understand your point of view and I agree that it needs to be gradually updated and innovated. I also understand that you are releasing the updates gradually. My point is just not to be "in the first wave". Wait a few days, and if there are no reported difficulties, upgrade.

So if I understand correctly, will I stay with this setup on 15.1.X ? My idea is to avoid situations like the one currently dealt with in this thread, for example: https://forum.eset.com/topic/31901-banking-payment-protection/ That is, to wait a few days to see if there are problems and then upgrade the version.

Just to make sure. If I switch "Application feature updates" will fix me to: 15.1.12, or 15.1.X, or 15.X.X ?

Thank you for information.

Where is it possible to set the product not to upgrade automatically ? For example current 15.0.23 to 15.1.12 . How to stay for some time at the last version ? Is it possible to possibly downgrade, i.e. 15.1.12 to 15.0.23 ?

As I understand it, it is also possible to rename a directory and then the files in it are no longer protected against tampering. Correct?

So how should the rules look like, for example to allow access to the "Documents" folder only for some programs (MS Office..)?

Can you give a concrete example of this? Or is there a guide somewhere on how to implement this?

Can you explain what actually happened here? To "break" the file/folder protection, is it enough to rename the parent folder? So how should the rules look like, for example to allow access to the "Documents" folder only for certain programs (MS Office..)?

Is the list of required properties visible somewhere? To see the status - required, under review, approved for implementation, and dynamically prioritized. Something like a poll up on this forum where it would be immediately visible what has been requested by whom and at what stage.

I'm not sure I can agree. The "big" numbering of browser versions (93,94,95 ..) is just cosmetic, marketing. It should realistically be 93.1, 93.2, maybe just 93.0.12, 93.0.24, etc. The changes inside are not big. On the other hand, how is support for Microsoft Office, for example, provided? There are several updates per month in the Current Channel as well, and every month the version number is elevated. Also, will they be without support for a few days each month? All I'm saying is that maybe for the "defined url open in secure browser" feature it would be good to change the approach to the solution. As it is, I don't see this as a workable solution.