Jump to content

Cousin Vinny

Members
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Cousin Vinny last won the day on August 29 2018

Cousin Vinny had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

1,067 profile views
  1. The issue is the Detections column in the Computers section reporting on blocked websites which began after the most recent upgrade. Not the Detections section as indicated in your original reply to me. The change caught me off guard because when I was interviewed, a portion had to do with what screen do administrators have open most often. For me, it's the Computers section which now constantly looks like an outbreak since there is no way to filter by detection category.
  2. Now that it's been a few days I just wanted to reiterate - this is a major oversight and I do not like how i've lost such a great deal of insight into my network due to the constant reporting of blocked websites. This feels like i've essentially lost one of the tools I use to monitor for infections and outbreaks since it's constantly accumulating web blocker detection that are completely useless to me are reported at the same level as an actual detection that I would care about. This really sucks and I was one of the people that was interviewed by ESET last year.
  3. How do I stop web protection from generating detections in ESMC? Every URL that gets blocked is now adding to the detections number and it's like the boy who cried wolf. Super annoying.
  4. Try running the "Computers with their RAM details" report instead of the "Count of computers grouped by total RAM capacity" report. It's in the same section.
  5. Yeah I don't necessarily see this as something wrong, it's just displaying exactly what each machine reports. The OP probably wants to run the "Computers with their RAM details" report instead if he just wants a raw count of hosts with total ram installed.
  6. I just ran the same report myself and can see what's going on here. Machines with less than 8192MB RAM will report each DIMM as an individual computer if they are from mixed manufacturers. Machines with greater than 8192MB will report each DIMM as it's own machine. E.g., my workstation with 8x4GB matched sticks appears in the report 8 times, each one having 4096MB RAM.
  7. Speaking as someone who is hands-on IT management rather than a reseller or MSP: That is how I would expect it to behave and should. My endpoints are configured for strict cleaning so I have not dealt with this issue, however if end users were greeted with option dialogs during an av scan without any way for the admin to suppress I would be quite aggravated with the product.
×
×
  • Create New...