Jump to content

AnthonyQ

Members
  • Posts

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

AnthonyQ last won the day on May 30 2022

AnthonyQ had the most liked content!

About AnthonyQ

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    China

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. According to Marcos, it seems that ESET is going to update its behavior detection this year...
  2. In ECS V7.0, when a threat sample has multiple detections, the detailed detection names cannot be displayed and the Detection field in the log will be empty.
  3. https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/28444-jawr-ransomware The answer is in the link you provided. No need to post it here.
  4. In my opinion, as macOS already has its built-in firewall, to differentiate from it, I suggest ECS's firewall integrated with LiveGrid reputation information and allowing for specifying policies based on this information. When it comes to AV for macOS, the focus should be on detection. I am excited to see ML and LiveGuard being implemented in ESET for Mac. By the way, can ML (Augur) and LiveGuard process macOS samples such as .app and .pkg files?
  5. Another feature I would like to ask for is ESET LiveGuard, exclusively for ESSP or Mac equivalent. Is it on the development roadmap?
  6. When I need to perform a thorough scan of a file, the most convenient method is to scan it using the options available in the context menu. However, currently, I have to manually drag and drop the file onto the main GUI in order to initiate a scan. Additionally, it seems that the real-time scanner is unable to perform a deep scan. Is your team planning to implement Pico update and/or advanced machine learning in ESET Cyber Security? This can further help achieve feature parity between the Windows version and Mac version of ESET.
  7. Seems to have been fixed, will continue to monitor. Btw, has the context menu scanning feature been permanently removed in ESET Cyber Security V7? I think it is a useful and necessary feature...
  8. Files with Green Reputation is considered as Clean, which can be regarded as whitelisted. It's wrong. No. of user is merely one factor, or even not a factor when calculating the reputation score. The primary factor, as stated on ESET website, is heur rules in the cloud.
  9. User numbers may influence reputation, but the primary factor is heuristic malware scanning conducted by LiveGrid. As Peter noted, items with Green bar in the Reputation field are whitelisted. I've previously submitted false positives to ESET, which now show a green reputation. Reputation—In most cases, ESET Internet Security and ESET LiveGrid® technology assign risk levels to objects (files, processes, registry keys, etc.) by using a series of heuristic rules that examine the characteristics of each object and then weigh their potential for malicious activity. Based on these heuristics, objects are assigned a risk level from 1 – Fine (green) to 9 – Risky (red). (https://help.eset.com/eis/16.2/en-US/idh_page_cloud.html)
  10. It is not true. There are two columns on the LiveGrid reputation page - one column is for "Reputation," and the other is for "Number of Users." I believe you are referring to the second column. (https://help.eset.com/eis/16.2/en-US/idh_page_cloud.html)
  11. Look at the first pic the OP shared. Before the detection was created, this malware sample had been whitelisted (indicated by the green color) in the LiveGrid.
  12. From my own experience, ESET is less stable on Mac compared to PC...
  13. Sadly, I can confirm that this issue was not fixed in recently released ESET Cyber Security Ver 7.4.1200.
  14. Tbh, I haven't seen and tested this feature in action because Intel TDT was rarely triggered by the ransomware samples I tested. @adulwahab , would you be so kind as to share the hash of the sample that was detected by Intel TDT?
×
×
  • Create New...