Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I tested the detection on a sample provided to me by other user, similar to the one used in the test on the links above, the principle of operation is very similar, but it is unlikely that they are the same. All detection settings were set to maximum. There was no detection. Fortunately, apparently your laboratory received samples either from the interface or by email, and the detection was added today https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/32a095cbad3232c38e2f6dd1d01db655c7c817b8bd858a916a368741902743a6/detection I hope that in the future Eset will be able to detect any similar uninstallers that
  2. Any good antivirus has at least two tasks - to protect information from theft, to protect the system and files from destruction. The fact that in the test there is only a broken uninstaller does not mean that you can close your eyes to it, because tomorrow such a file may be sent to a some person with some message, I don't know, for example, look at what a cool game or something like that, with intent for a person to run the file and lose the working system and part of the working files. So, this is an attack vector, yes, this is not a terrible hacker technique and not a zero-day vulnerability
  3. Do you think anyone else is looking at these tests from "prestigious" labs? Where does the spanish Panda have 100% detection, and your own Eset is the 5th in performance (latest performance tests by AV-Comparatives)? Where, in principle, almost all antiviruses have a protection level of 97 percent or higher (I'm talking about the latest dynamic test from AV-Comparatives), which does not coincide with the real experience of most professional PC users? Consumers either do not look at tests at all or look at live tests / reviews, but these prestigious laboratories have drawn completely stupi
  4. Hi Eset! comss.ru is a very popular russian-language web-portal about antiviruses in Russia and the CIS, which regularly tests new versions of well-known antivirus products. For two tests in a row, Eset has unfortunately failed their testing, which makes me very sad, as a loyal fan of your product. It becomes really difficult for me to protect Eset's reputation, although I try to do it there =( Below are links to a video with tests. Test for ESET NOD32 Internet Security 13.2 - https://www.comss.ru/page.php?id=7740 Test for ESET NOD32 Internet Security 14.0 - https://www.comss.ru
  5. 3. Tell that to Blokada and Adguard developers. Ads can be blocked through dns filtering (Blokada), and you can also intercept https traffic using your own certificate and cut it (AdGuard) - all this is done through emulation of a local vpn or through creating a local proxy server. There are options to do this directly, if the user has root rights. 4. Your protection supports 1.5 built-in browsers, which are impossible to use if you have even a little taste and customization needs, while even another European antivirus with more powerful protection (according to the results of tests by in
  6. I use two-factor authentication whenever possible with Authy. Authy with cloud backup is free and works on all popular platforms and devices. I think that for many users it is really difficult and just an unnecessary burden. Many are not even particularly intimidated by the possibility of hacking their social media account or mail. In general, the mass user is not very smart, we cannot do anything about it.
  7. Description: Protecting bank payment mode in modern browsers without IE using Details: If Eset does not support the default browser for the protected mode, then it first must searches for the installed Edge, Firefox or Google Chrome, and IE is used only when there are no alternatives at all. Real life example: I have Vivaldi installed as the default browser, but Eset in this case launches protected banking mode in Internet Explorer, which has long been outdated and can hardly be called a safe browser. The system also has the new Edge and Firefox. After removing IE from the system, Es
  8. Can you give a complete list of supported browsers? Only Firefox, IE, Google Chrome and maybe Edge? I have Vivaldi installed as the default browser - it's a fairly well-known browser, like Brave, for example, but instead of launching it in protected mode or even Edge, which is also installed on the system, Eset launches IE eventually, which seems absurd, since this browser has long been outdated, and at least Edge and Firefox are installed on the system too. I think that Eset needs to change its behavior and stop using the IE corpse, even if it does not support the default browser install
  9. Hi Eset team and especially your product manager! I have been using Eset not so long ago, but I already really like it and I actively defend it on the Internet forums. I have some ideas that I would like to offer you for implementation, so that the product becomes even better and more popular. Description: Add the ability to block any hosts for applications in the firewall rules Details: Eset has one of the most flexible and powerful firewalls on the market, but sorely lacks a feature to block a specific host for a specific application. For example, I would like to block access to google-
  • Create New...