Jump to content

SlashRose

ESET Insiders
  • Posts

    327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by SlashRose

  1. 1 hour ago, peteyt said:

    How long should it take though because generally speaking on bootup eset is taking often in the region of 20 minutes to update. I've supplied some logs and understand that it is using less resources but something under 1mb should be quick. I can imagine a lot of people thinking something was wrong with their AV due to this.

    If you can hardly use your system during this time, then something is wrong with Eset and anyone who disagrees does not really seem to know Eset! But is only my personal opinion.

  2. 9 hours ago, Peter Randziak said:

    Hallo Leute,

    Ich habe Protokolle zu diesem Problem von @Lockbits und das Problem wird vom Entwicklerteam überprüft (P_EESW-7598).

    Bisher scheint es durch Änderungen in unserem Code verursacht zu werden...

    Petrus

    Oh Mr. Randziak, in another post, where I just replied to them, where it is also about this error, they wrote that this is normal and can take 20 minutes, very contradictory statements from them!

  3. Mr. Randziak, you don't really want to tell me that this update behavior of Eset is normal? No, it's not, because as you should have seen, working on Windows is almost impossible during this time, I'm always surprised by the answers when reporting errors.

    If you show me an AV that behaves similarly, there is none!

    And the system has never been under load, even with others where this error occurs, because we have no apple boxes as a PC!

  4. I also post a post about it, but this was misunderstood by Marcos and he was only of the opinion that it was due to OpenVPN, which is complete nonsense. Yes Eset has a VPN problem with enabling the NetBios request, and this is an Eset problem! And the VPN connection has never been recognized by Eset as it should be as a new network.

    I only have this problem as well as other problems since the new build 14.2.19.0, z.b. that the download of the virus signatures now and then abort the download, but not abort in the actual sense, the virus signature remains in the middle of the download and it can neither be aborted nor anything else, it then only helps to restart the PC

  5. 20 hours ago, itman said:

    Simple solution here is just exclude this eMule .exe from Eset file submission if the submissions bother you this much.

    No, the eMule was only submitted once, everything is only submitted once, only if the same eMule has been running on the PC for 6 years, then Eset already knows it.

    And if I then scan the files with Eset (also offline) and then also scan the submitted files online via https://www.virustotal.com/gui/, the submitted files are also classified as clean and that is again all files that are submitted that I have had on the PC for years, so Eset already knows them.

    Itman doesn't bother me, I just wonder why, since like I said Eset already knows her.

     

    @Marcos, what kind of suspicious network communication?

  6. 2 minutes ago, itman said:

    Yes, looks last time eMule was updated at SourceForge was 2016.

    Can eMule generate internal dynamic code on-the-fly when running? Perhaps a change in sensitivity in one of Eset behavior detection mechanisms is now triggering on this activity resulting in the submissions.

    No, because this eMule was rewritten for me personally in 2016 and has some more functions than the normal official eMule.

  7. 21 hours ago, itman said:

    I posted a year; not 6 years.

    Also the source code for this keylogger was posted in clear text on a pen-tester web site since 2016.

    Finally, Eset only starting detecting it after it finally flagged something suspicious in the code and uploaded it to LiveGrid servers for a full sandbox scan and full sig. creation.

    Itman you misunderstood something, not you posted 6 years, but I have been using Muli for 6 years and of course Eset then already knows eMule, or do you see it differently, because your opinion interests me most, because you know what you are talking about. Probably because of the translation you misunderstood!

×
×
  • Create New...