Jump to content

rotaru

Members
  • Posts

    135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About rotaru

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    Canada

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. So, you just found a "malware" which can affect ESET.....ESET should protect its own rules from deleting by another software.
  2. Just checked this one , done 1 day ago: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/db140710092bd084f35c5a0231d8a2a11132ff9ae110d44a61667e3c9120cdc5 No detection from ESET Detection from Microsoft Defender
  3. I said it 100 time already: look at Microsoft Defender: free, 99.8% detection rate vs 99.2% and detecting these.....
  4. ...with Win 7x32 starter edition (2GB RAM) which version of NOD32 should I install and from where can I download it? Thanks..
  5. Thank you for your answer! However, this does not clarify how ESET can perform a detection and disinfection instantaneous while the other players need between 5 and 10 sec from the moment of detection till displaying a message.
  6. Yes, but this is not the point; you said that if the file id determined to be malicious is deleted silently, if not, probably is not deleted. I would like to know what happened and what was the outcome of the submission.
  7. Thank you for your answer, makes sense! however I believe is totally wrong from ESET to declare " issue solved" while is still performing the task and to perform the actions "silently".... From commercial point of view is spectacular( wau!!!, ESET is so fast) but in reality Eset should display something like "Analyzing......" and when the process is finished , only then should declare it solved.
  8. Yes, but this "theory" should be valid for any antivirus. So, why the antiviruses mentioned above (which are reputable, with good results in AV comparatives) spend 5-10 sec in "cleaning" while ESET can do it instantaneous?????
  9. I "played" a little bit with several antiviruses (Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Webroot, Windows Defender) Without exception, all of them , upon detection of a malware will exhibit a "change in status" , will "do something" for 5-8 sec, after that getting a message about the detection and the outcome of detection. For example: Kaspersky will display a yellow triangle and exclamation mark on its own icon, will do something for 5-10 ses after that getting a banner about what happened and how was fixed. Bitdefender will display a banner asking you to wait while the action is being performed. Defender will change the status of the icon, will do something for 5-10 ses , after that icon change to normal Webroot will display a yellow exclamation mark while will remove and rescan the PC (1-2 min) Only ESET performs all these instantaneous. You get a warning which is displayed as many sec you selected and that's it. So, when is ESET "disinfecting" or "cleaning" in fact???? How ESET knows the cleaning or disinfection is possible? Shouldn't ESET perform the task FIRST and after that inform the user about outcome?????
  10. So, what do you want?
  11. So, you "suppose" or you know for a fact that this is a DNA detection?
  12. Was the only available MD5 I could extract from your post. Surprisingly enough though , Microsoft Defender (free) detects it!
  13. I checked VT for the detection you mentioned in your post (77E5E64742EF85E2DD5F05C7571A98D0C6583346) I got this: Detected by ESET more than 1 month ago.
  14. I thought we were not supposed to believe whatever is posted on Youtube.....
×
×
  • Create New...