bEeReE

That's the problem.... I am currently only testing Eset and will probably switch from Bitdefender as I don't like the Mac version. For family members, especially elderly ones, the reputation based info of TrafficLight is very helpful so I look a little bit for standalone alternatives because Eset doesn't provide sth., but don't like browser plugins from Norton, MacAfee etc. It is in question at all if I wan't to install a plugin giving another attack vector... but hard to communicate such if people are used to... Anyway, don't want to steal the threads topic, which is likely not Safari related

Is there a good one for Safari? WOT plugin isn‘t supported currently....

Thanks a lot, Peter! I have successfully tested this version (received from support) and can confirm that the speed was back

Would be beneficial to categorize such sites into a separate category so that users will be able to block those, in my point of view....I am not affected. But for others it may be great... Categorization of Brightcloud: Proxy Avoidance and Anonymizers.

But how to deal with such vpn an proxies? Isn‘t there a possibility of blocking a „proxy“ category? How is e.g. cyberghostvpn.com be categorized?

Same. Opened the 2nd ticket at local support. Now I was told that they were able to reproduce and wait for a response from developers...

I use Untangle NG Firewall and I am quite happy. I can block applications like your posted cybergho based on dedicated application filter etc. However, router based doesn‘t work if you are on mobile network etc. Similarly, DNS filters will not work if you change the DNS settings on your client and being outside of your controlled LAN. For sure, you could force VPN connection to home via App etc., but not if there is a possibIlity to easily delete the app. Depending on the age, they can also install a rogue access point and build their own WLAN at home thus not being detected as the child

Can‘t eset block a related category? E.g. proxies, vpns or uncategorized sites? Depends on categorization, not?

I don't use parental control. But depending on what you mean with "something with the vpn" I guess he deactivated the Eset Proxy in macOS's network settings or he installed a vpn service etc. If you want to fully control his machine, you should probably create an administrator account and downgrade his account to a standard account. Then, you can ensure that administrative tasks require administrator password (e.g. macOS settings/security/additional options"). Changing the network settings or installation of applications etc. could be restricted this way. Further, Eset can be configured to res

Thanks a lot! Added to the web protection and now much more phishing sites are detected.... great.

This isn‘t the case any longer, isn‘t it? Referring to other posts, port 443 should not be listet....are we thus loosing the capabilities of blocking https phishing sites?

Any news related to the network speed issues? Facing the issues with Big Sur 11.2.1 and Cyber Security (for Mac) 610.460.1 200Mbps download with the Eset Proxy connected, 450Mbps when disconnected according to speedtest.net.

The issue is still not solved, right? Started from scratch with a new install and this time Cyber Security (not pro). It cuts the speed when testing on speedtest.net

I have similar issues and created a ticket (140953). As per my investigation, there could be an issue regarding the protected System Volume of macOS. Apple installs the system files on a separate volume and grants only read-only rights (also for reason of malware protection), whereas data is stored in a separate partition. When you go into the Apple Disk Utility, one is labeled with "Macintosh HD", the other "Macintosh HD Data" and you see the difference. In Finder however, this isn't visible as both are named with "Macintosh HD". Apple connects both partitions with symbolic links.

Same here. Other forum entries report similar issues...