Jump to content

FRiC

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FRiC

  1. 2 hours ago, Marcos said:

    Correct. There is currently a 30-day period after the release before we make uPCU available. This is to prevent millions of computers worldwide to upgrade to the latest version automatically which would be a problem if a bug affecting a lot of users was discovered after the roll-out. Even Microsoft doesn't push the latest version of the OS to all users immediately.

    Thanks for the info. Will try auto-update next time. Incidentally my latest update to 8.0.2039 did not go smoothly. I've done the upgrade task countless times without any problems but this time a number of computers (out of 100+) could not complete the update. Had to remove (some even in safe mode) and reinstall.

  2. Does setting update mode to Auto-update mean the endpoints will update to the latest releases (e.g. 8.0.2039) without having to create a task? I created a task to update to 8.0.2039 and about half of my endpoints still required a reboot. Much better than all requiring a reboot, but still.

    And a month seems a bit long.

  3. Sorry, the machine wasn't rebooting by itself. I was rebooting it manually to see if the problem would go away when I changed settings (regional format mentioned above). The computer also got shut down at the end of the work day. I could run the log collector on another computer if necessary.

  4. I noticed today that some of our computers are showing no virus provider in Windows Security. EES is current 7.3.2041.0 and there's nothing obvious in ESMC or in the logs.

    It seems random since all of our computers are domain joined Windows 10, Version 2004 and there doesn't seem to be anything special about the ones that are showing this warning. Anyone seeing anything like this?

    Thanks.

    image.png.7fd566ad84557355d1346efee1803bab.png

  5. We use deployed Windows and I've noticed the same thing. It also happens if Windows is updated to a new release and before the user logs in.

    Edit: I just noticed this recently, so not sure if this is something new. Another new thing I noticed is that it's now harder to drag computers into another group since the group panel scrolls too early and too fast.

  6. 17 hours ago, Brambb said:

    Also I notice that the reboot also needs to be a 'warm reboot', we have a lot of clients who TURN OFF and next day TURN ON (shutdown, cold start) but this does NOT trigger ESET to do the module update or whatever the reboot is required for. Users actually need to do the 'warm reboot' for the message to cleared and update to be fully complete.

    That's Windows 10 fast startup. Disable it in settings or in GPO to make shut downs behave "normally".

  7. Thanks for the quick response. I had these computers configured this way since we bought ESET early this year and this issue only started recently. Strangely enough they didn't all start happening on the same day and it didn't affect all computers. Anyway I've added https://esmc to the whitelist and temporarily disable EES...

    image.png.db489aa6479636fb9db2270f82582754.png

    Update: and all is well now. I just find it somewhat strange that I've been running this for nine months, and now suddenly I have to whitelist https://emsc/

    image.png.59255546bc00dad71baaa343f79502e0.png

     

  8. Windows 10 Pro, ESET Endpoint Security, ESMC, all latest versions.

    I have some computers that have all websites blocked except for some necessary Windows update and ESET update sites whitelisted. They connect to the local ESMC server called simply "esmc". A few days ago I noticed they stopped connecting to ESMC and upon checking the logs I discover that https://esmc is blocked. Has there been a change to how ESET communicates with ESMC? Should I whitelist the local ESMC server?

  9. Update to this issue:

    I couldn't figure out the problem, so I just created a rule to whitelist the HDD. I noticed afterwards that the HDD appears to Windows as a removable device, i.e. it has a removable icon in the task bar and can be removed like a USB drive, even though in the device manager it appears as a normal HDD. Which is probably why ESET sees it as a removable device and tries to block it, but since the first partition is the boot drive and likely can't be blocked, it ended up blocking the second partition.

  10. Hi, I'm using device control to block removable drives, I blocked "disk storage" which seems to work fine for everyone except one particular machine where it blocked the second partition of the internal hard drive. Am I missing something obvious or should I choose another type of device instead of "disk storage"? Portable device maybe?

    The computer is Windows XP 5.1.2600 running ESET Endpoint Security 6.5.2132.2.

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    2018-12-14_115743.png

  11. EES 7 was recently updated from 7.0.2073.1 to 7.0.2091.0 and ESMC started prompting me that users' computers need to be restarted before updates can be installed. I was a little surprised that I had to manually reboot the computers either physically or through ESMC's reboot function before updates can be installed. Even if the computers are turned off at the end of the day they didn't count as restarts. Am I missing something obvious or is this by design?

  12. 12 hours ago, MartinK said:

    Actually that is different problem. Adapters should be shown in the same order/priority as configured in system. Could you please check that physical adapter is first in list?

    Thanks, didn't realize that's the problem. I don't want to hijack this thread, but is the priority of the network adapter configured by manually setting the metric (doesn't work) or is there another way?

×
×
  • Create New...