Jump to content

100

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 100

  1.  

    7 hours ago, puff-m-d said:

     

    @User is on pre-release updates. Maybe you are using regular updates?

    Yes, I know that he is on pre-release updates and I'm using regular updates. But I thought, that only modules with the "P" at the end are pre-release modules. And for the "Prüfmodul für Routerschwachstellen" there is a difference of 2 versions and more than 2 month.

  2. Why do I have these older modules?

    user: HIPS-Unterstützung: 1291 (20170711)
    me:   HIPS-Unterstützung: 1290 (20170705)

    user: Sicheres Online-Banking und Bezahlen: 1108 (20170714)
    me:   Sicheres Online-Banking und Bezahlen: 1107 (20170628)

    user: Prüfmodul für Routerschwachstellen: 1039 (20170627)
    me:   Prüfmodul für Routerschwachstellen: 1037 (20170419)

    All others are the same or newer.

  3. On 6.5.2017 at 9:46 PM, 100 said:

    I use this special application (freeware): don't sleep

    Don't Sleep and all other tools that I know uses "SetThreadExecutionState" and it is no more reliable. (Sometimes my Windows 7 PC goes to hibernate while such tools are running or a media stream is played.) Software should now use "Power Availibility Requests" to prevent Windows from energy save modes

    Comparison between "SetThreadExecutionState" and "Power Availibility Requests":

    https://decatec.de/programmierung/c-sharp-windows-standby-unterdruecken/

  4. Only applications can tell Windows that it is not allowed to enter the energy saving mode. Some media applications do this (e.g. Winamp). I use this special application (freeware): don't sleep

    But while "don't sleep" is running, Eset can't send Windows to sleep or hibernate mode after the scan. If I want to use this Eset feature, I have to play music with Winamp while Eset is scanning. This works.

    @itman A full scan takes 5 hours for me. I do this once a month.

     

  5. After an on-demand scan I had the following entry for all mails of my zipped mail backups, which all have an archive level of only one (not archive in archive):

    "Zu viele Archive verschachtelt" / "too many archives embedded"

    I had also tried the maximum settings for the limits, without any difference.

    I can't remember this for ESS 9.0.408

    58aa95d0a6bbc_error_with_an_archive_level_of_only_one.thumb.jpg.da7383536e3fd687d3fda3cc6b7bd8c7.jpg

    EIS10_ondemand_custom-profile.thumb.jpg.86475a248166f8e07b312f56d37d3b2d.jpg

    EIS10_ondemand_limits.thumb.jpg.93e9a75d15b975b26f1aa6a41c4aadc9.jpg

    EDIT: It seems to be, that the logged reason is wrong and the right reason is, that only the archive size is too big. The archive has an size of 2.2 GB and the maximum size limit with Eset is 2 GB.

    Archive_size.jpg.b2dfd3fce814a63cbef7b4bc6564314f.jpg

    archive_size_limit.thumb.jpg.7a284c0c99a952ac41111d98da495d86.jpg

  6. I found out, that it only occurs if the senders address is in the exception list. In my case this mails are status mails from my own computer. Therefore sender and recipient are the same and the address is in my exception list (automatically done from Eset).

     

    Test:

    - Send an mail to yourself (your mail address should be in the exception or positive list)

    - Classify the received mail as spam manually

    - Reclassify the mail as non spam manually

  7. After the update from 9.0.386.0 to 9.0.402.0:

    The subject of an mail in Windows Live Mail client, which is/was classified as spam and Eset has added the text [sPAM] (or any other user defined) to it, is no more shown in the list of mails. This remains after these mails are reclassified as non spam manually and Eset has removed the additional text.

    post-11617-0-25923300-1473279133_thumb.jpg

  8. There's a visual bug in v9.0.381 and v9.0.386 which cause incorrect information about the last update to be displayed in gui. However, this does not affect the protection nor program's functionality. Neither V10 nor other products are affected. It is not clear yet if there will be any further build of v9 as we are close to the release of v10.

    I can not confirm this bug with ESS 9.0.381 and Windows 7x64, but with 9.0.386 and Windows 7 x64.

  9. Why does eset reset the protection statistics of "antivirus and antispyware protection" on every startup?

     

    This does not happen for the "email client antispam protection" statistics.

     

    The online helps of ESS are wrong and describes an reset for the "email client antispam protection" statistics on every startup:

    hxxp://help.eset.com/ess/9/en-US/?idh_page_statistic.htm

    hxxp://help.eset.com/ess/8/en-US/?idh_page_statistic.htm

     

    The online helps of EAS does not mention a reset of the "antivirus and antispyware protection" statistics:

    hxxp://help.eset.com/eav/9/en-US/?idh_page_statistic.htm

    hxxp://help.eset.com/eav/8/en-US/?idh_page_statistic.htm

×
×
  • Create New...