Jump to content

Matus

Former ESET Employees
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Matus

  1. Hi Rekun,

    If you deploy ESLC per server, you'll get rid off latency, however database of scanned files is big as # of VMs. If sample was scanned with modules 3 version older than actual, new scan is performed (to avoid that because of lack of information we marked some file as clean, however it's malicious).

    If you deploy ESLC per location (datacenter/cluster...), some lag will be introduced, however # of VMs in grid will be much higher and thus benefit is higher too. Only hash with reputation is transferred so network load will be minimal. I'd recommend this solution. (configuration in ERA will be easier as well)

  2. Hi,

    I'd like to point out, that in case you have 10 servers with 10VMs on each, only these 10VMs are offloading scanning to security VM appliance (EVSA), which is deployed on same physical server (in this scenario, you'll have 10 EVSAs in your environment). If you'd install 10 endpoints on each guest VM I'm not sure, whether you'll improve utilization.

    It's however true, that our Endpoint is safer that VMware vShield solution.

     

    It's up to customer, whether he wants more security or better utilization. 

×
×
  • Create New...