root

@Marcos does it mean v7 will be "Endpoint equipped" (for example antispam and others) and in fact will subseqent v6 or Endpoint will be simply retired with no alternative, and only Antivirus (v7) available ?

@Robertos but V7 is Antivirus, not Endpoint, currently. So why users with lower (and cheaper) version will be equipped with more functionality ?

Why Livieguard (guard, not grid) is still not available for MacOS ? v. Endpoint Security - 6.11.616.0 (I guess it is new version for Sonoma) and still LiveGuard is not available...

Why Livieguard (guard, not grid) is still not available for MacOS ? v. Endpoint Security - 6.11.616.0 (I guess it is new version for Sonoma) and still LiveGuard is not available...

Chas4, v7 is "endpoint antivirus" ver only. The latest "endpoint security" is 6x ver the latest: https://www.eset.com/int/business/download/endpoint-security-mac/ v7 antivirus: https://www.eset.com/int/business/download/endpoint-antivirus-mac/ Liveguard is supported for Win & Linux users only, pitty.... "Which operating system environments can use ESET LiveGuard Advanced for analysis in a controlled environment?ESET LiveGuard Advanced works with supported ESET security products on Windows and Linux. The analysis starts on the operating system, where the sample has the highest chance to do harmful actions. Parameters cannot be manually defined."

foneil thank you for the answer, but the question is why eset doesn't like Mac users. " For desktop and laptop computers, Microsoft's Windows is the most used at 69%, followed by Apple's macOS at 17%, and Google's ChromeOS at 3.2% (in the US up to 8.0%), and "desktop Linux" at 2.9%. In addition, 5% is attributed to "unknown" operating systems - which are likely forms of BSD or obscure varieties of Linux.[4] (source: Wikipedia) Mac is 17% holder worldwide, so in particular countries it can be > 50% (USA?), whilst linux is only 3% and is acppraciated and in effect supported by eset.

Marcos, please note, we were not able to activate license "ESET LiveGuard Advanced for Endpoint Security + Server Security" on Ventura and Monterey machine as well. We issued a ticket and official support (https://www.eset.com/pl/about/contact/) judged that license (functionality) is not supported on MacOS. Does it support Win machines only ?

I had to uninstall eset - it blocked network totally. Once uninstalled everything works like a harm. The last macOS ver by eset supported is ventura. We pay subscription continuously and unable to use the product eset

I had to apply all politics again to dynamic group (which include PCs). It's strange, I changed nothing before.... Anything changed in politics was NOT applied to clients. Green indicator was shown near clients in console it means that all were connected. Also testing task was sent (simply start detecting) and it was successfully applied. But when I changed anything in politic it was not (i e "integrate with Outlook" or other). Since assigned all politics again (simply "assign to dynamic group" one by one) everything was done. I do not understand why. BTW when I marked all politics, was not able to assign to Win dynamic group, I had to one by one, consider to change it...

The only solution is to switch off integration with outlook

Today there is same issue as in 2022, we receive the same spam mail over and over when I empty spam folder with 50 emails I receive immediately 100. When 100 -> 200 and so on Problem was deceived in data UKS las year by the way, “Accepted file types: txt, log, zip, rar, png, jpg, etl, pdf, gif, dat, mp3, mp4, avi” thus we can’t add screen heic - > directly from iPhone, change it (!)

Hello is it possible to block any unauthorized computers from accessing to a local company network thru politics ? I saw similar on the router settings by letting by particular IP, but not know how to perform it (if possible) in eset protect console nowadays anybody can come to company and plug-in the cable to company’s network and is IN The question is to protect it and only managed machines could access to local LAN thanks in advance

Hello is it possible to block any unauthorized computers from accessing to a local company network thru politics ? I saw similar on the router settings by letting by particular IP, but not know how to perform it (if possible) in eset protect console thanks in advance

we have installed version 2060 15 mins ago. eset immediately reported a critical error that the outlook integration plugin is not enabled (due to the unfortunate version of 2051 we had this functionality disabled for 3 months), after enabling the outlook integration the problem stopped.

We suspect this is known issue starting from already nonexistent ver 2051. We experienced this nightmare at the very beginning of July. According to some opinions of other users in v 2057 this problem has not been solved (we do not decided to run antispasmodic option unless is finally fixed). Your post looks to confirm that eset is still working on a solution Up to ver 2046 anti spam was working properly. Maybe Marcos will give us any updated info https://forum.eset.com/topic/33024-outlook-and-eset-outlook-add-in-sync-issuesconflicts/#comment-153420

can anybody advise? Today after switch on computer there are > 100 notifications. OneDrive is stuck on replicating couple of files thanks in advance

Try to define which Java is used directory in Apache tomcat in Java tab.(bin/server.dll)

Thank you now all is clear BTW. In this link there is also mentioned regarding to Java, that supported version is JDK 17. We use JDK 18 and all is working fine. Would you advise to downgrade to 17 or keep using 18 ? thank you in advance

Pity … we decided to wait a couple of days/weeks to check if 2057 fixed the problem, after a nightmare after defective v 2051 (which is even not available now, there is 2046 and 2057 😉). Eset should consider to revert to ver 2046 with antispam which was working fine, don’t you think ?

Is it incompatible? We were trying to run webconsole with newest Apache but no result. With Apache 9xxx I works fine thanks for opinions and tips

we assume that this unfortunate version of 2051 has also been thoroughly tested? after all, no one was rushing. how much our nerves, stress, time and dedication cost all of us - because how were we supposed to know it was a mistake in the eset version. therefore we asked for redress, one way or the other…. we were looking for the word sorry or apologize in this thread….

dear Marcos from eset Perhaps the simplest way would be simply revert to previous version instead of wading into defected solution implemented in version 2051 ? Pls note we are facing this problem for 2 months and must have antyspam off so far but in endpoint version we pay for it. We are not test users but we are customers. Does ESET consider to compensate our wasted time and break in using feature we pay for but we don’t have?

is there any progress or left unfixed ? Outlook integration and antispam must be off so far

one more note. after updating to 2051, i.e. since the problems occurred, we noticed that when attaching any mailbox in outlook, the folder structure is different. the spam folder still exists as IMAP but additionally a folder called "junk mail - this computer only" was created. the spam folder did not have an "empty folder" feature, while this feature was active in the "junk mail - this computer only" folder. this change applied to all mailboxes, ie individual and shared mailboxes. after disabling the integration option with outlook and other options indicated on the print screens mentioned in the entries above, the folder structure in outlook, when connecting the account, it creates properly as before the update, i.e. the spam folder has the "empty folder" function active and the "junk mail - only this computer" folder it does not form at all. therefore, instead of creating the function of excluding folders from scanning that was proposed in the hotfix, eset should immediately check what it broke in the update and should immediately restore the previous functionality before the update to 2051, such a structure was created with the outlook integration option turned on

Dear Marcos, I would rather suggest to return to the ver solution before 2051 rather then omit some folders. Please note we also use mobile ver of Outlook or Mail app (Apple) on iOS or Android with attached the same email account IMAP, for example on my iPhone there is no ESET..... What if I manually move mail from my mobile from Inbox to SPAM folder which will be "omitted" in ESET on our PCs ? For instance on Sunday evening when all PCss are off.... Moreover, on web app junk folder is really used as JUNK (name of the folder), whilst on PC is SPAM folder (both are visible, but on web Junk is used, on PCs SPAM is used automatically). Note before ver 2051 all was fine. To consider...