yesnoo

Hello, I recently won ESSP 1 Year license on malwaretips giveaway. Can you tell me the self-life of the license? Thank You

Any info here from the staff?

I too need kinda similar info. I am running Eset Smart Security 9...won the license in MalwareTips giveaway...Expiry 30 April 2017 I have now won MalwareTips giveaway for Eset Smart Security Premium 10 1 year License. Can you merge both the license & give me a single license for Eset Internet Security 10 i.e remaining days of previous license + 1 year of new license for Eset Internet Security 10?

Its not Eset related. Its Firefox prob.

I do also have hang problem but the hang problem has already occurred before I installed ESET, so definitely not ESET problem. Are you sure it is related to ESET? My system will only hang when everytime I surf FB and few other websites. I meant its Firefox prob. Its not Eset related.

I had tried latest Firefox, at that time FF was at version 36.0.3. I had tested for an hour & during that time I had no prob like Chrome. But FF sometimes use to hang for 15-20 secs & this was an irritating prob. Quite a few users have mentioned this prob. I had also tried 36.0.4 but the same hang prob. I also tried Cyberfox 32 & 64 Bits & had the same 15-20 secs hang prob. I am not sure but guess FF has some probs with Adobe Flash i.e No Flash installed, I didn't had the hang prob for 30 mins test browsing with both FF & CF. But cant be sure Flash is the prob as mentioned the test browsing was just 30 mins. But yes, with FF & Flash installed, I get the hang prob quickly. And the hang prob appears on random HTTPS sites & mouse cannot be moved. I had mentioned the prob on Wilders & came to know that some users facing & some not facing this prob.

Thanxx for the info

Hey, Ok, tried for more than an hour. Prerelease updates didn't worked for me i.e exactly the same prob. And product update I understand, how can virus databases update solve the mentioned issue in this thread? And I dont understand, sometimes browsing is fine & suddenly prob appears & then again fine & then again probs. And I must mention when it works, works zippy & when doesn't, quite slow or sites keeps loading & never loads for quite a long time & you cancel. I use only Adblock Plus & had uninstalled it for the tests. And FW correctly picks router IP but when I use my direct connection it picks my IP wrong as 169.x.x.x I delete the zone rules, restart the system, still it picks wrong most of the time. But I think this is not the reason for the probs as net works the same even if IP is detected correctly. Also I tried selecting both Home & Public but the same issue on both. And yes I restarted the system everytime I changed something to test. I will try EAV again & see how thing goes otherwise may try other AV as currently little busy. I may not be able to do further tests & provide feedback as mentioned little busy & this is taking time & affecting work. Thanxx all for the support & valuable time. Any time I get will be here to see any updates or report any findings from my side if I did any tests. Regards Yesnoo

As I have mentioned earlier Eset doesn't disable Win 7 FW i.e Win FW section shows in red colour & managed by Eset. But Win FW advanced settings shows Private/Public "ON" & I manually "OFF" these. Could disabling these be the reason for browsing slowdown? I mean does Eset FW works with Win FW & need these "ON" & that's why Eset FW doesn't "OFF" these or Eset FW is not dependent on Win FW & it is safe to "OFF" these?

If I enable https scan for parental control, does this means https scan that is disabled by default will be enabled?

Is the procedure correct to perform prerelease updates for latest version ESS/EAV 8? Check prerelease updates, clear update cache, ok & restart the system & then perform update. To revert back Check regular mode & then ok.

In this case ESS or NOD32 won't scan the network traffic from chrome for malware. However all files saved to disk are scanned anyway, so if you find no other (temporarily) solution you could let it this way. Not recommended at all. By doing so, you'd lose protection in Chrome, namely: - malicious / phishing urls wouldn't be blocked - Live Grid blocking wouldn't work\ - specific Internet-borne threats might not be detected and blocked - malware in archives could make it to the disk and run under specific circumstances. url blocking - Ok Live Grid - Realtime i.e Resident protection also has Live Grid blocking, right? Internet-borne threats - This will be blocked by Resident protection if they try to enter the system, right? Archives malware run - This will be blocked by Resident protection, right? So threats will not be blocked at chrome level but will be blocked at system level, right? Is the protection provided by webshield same as resident protection & just an early detection of threats or webshield scanning abilities & protection are different than resident protection?

Ok, I will give a try. I want to use ESS but its giving me more probs i.e browsing slowdown & chrome prob compared to EAV i.e chrome prob only. So I am running EAV. Now the prob is everytime there is a suggestion here in the forum, I have to uninstall EAV, install ESS, then reinstall EAV as the prob is not solved, then update & complete the scan as it mention improves future performance. This becomes troublesome. It would be good if there is an add/remove feature in ESS i.e you can add/remove AV/FW. If I will try prerelease, will post the outcome here.

Just to make sure, does the problem persist with pre-release updates enabled and Internet protection module 1185 installed? For the moment I am trying another AV. But if I reinstall EAV, I may not try prerelease stuffs as I dont install beta/prerelease stuffs on production system. I dont have test machine. Can prerelease updates be uninstalled after testing then I could try. Or may be under Shadow Defender I could try.

In this case ESS or NOD32 won't scan the network traffic from chrome for malware. However all files saved to disk are scanned anyway, so if you find no other (temporarily) solution you could let it this way. Not recommended at all. By doing so, you'd lose protection in Chrome, namely: - malicious / phishing urls wouldn't be blocked - Live Grid blocking wouldn't work\ - specific Internet-borne threats might not be detected and blocked - malware in archives could make it to the disk and run under specific circumstances. Chrome is my main browser. Guess will have to try other AV for the moment.