Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
  1. Oh interesting, that's surely better than starting from scratch.
  2. Yeah got that, worked with some databases and know you can't just copy between them in anything except very basic cases. Just meant that since it doesn't work, i will consider starting a new, didn't mean it in a bad way, it is what it is Mainly thinking about it for performance reasons, have had some odd cases in windows where it goes on a high load, think the process was something like "erknt" or similar, i couldn't figure out if it was the ESMC itself or the antivirus part on the server.
  3. So they can just be over-installed? Well i would prefer to keep the old data, but if that's not possible i will keep this in mind in case i go with it, thanks!
  4. Think it's not MySQL sadly. What implications would it be to not do a migration like that, would it mess up all the clients?
  5. Is it possible to migrate from ESMC installed on a windows server to a ESMC virtual appliance, can't seem to find much info on that.
  6. Having some difficulties still, but i think the main issue was that the policies seemed to overwrite the firewall rules by default or something? Couldn't quite figure it out, but if i had multiple policies, it would mess things up, if i had one, it seems to work. I don't quite get the part where you allow something in the firewall, but it can still be blocked via the IDS, is that supposed to happen?
  7. Stupid question but i just can't get any policies to work that tries to allow connections. I have tried making Miracast work by allowing port 7236. Tried making Powershell Remoting work by allowing port 5985 etc. I do set the port on both Local/Remote, and i tried using with and without ip ranges. Could someone provide an example perhaps, i am most likely missing something very obvious. Thanks!
  8. "due to the included configuration of all of the components", what do you mean with that? don't you have to configure it anyway? And in my case it's below 5000, and i found the web console thing to be kinda slow, not to any extremes though, but a bit too slow for my taste if you will. So if the virtual appliance is more lightweight or better optimized for a virtual environment i might give it a try to compare. I am a fan of having servers being, well servers rather than having a windows server with a gui and all just running a server application, quite some resources going to waste (e
  9. As title says, is there any performance differences?
  • Create New...