Jump to content

eset.user.new

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by eset.user.new

  1. Thank you for your replies.

     

    Still no one is answering to my question, why we are considered as PUA.

     

    Arakasi,Swex, and Eset:

    [-] Last year we had inside our application a lot of banners and advertisements!

         We removed them all!

    [-] We do not have any toolbar, or any system changing!!

    [-] We doing our best to be clean!!!

     

    I followed this `antispyware` document, and we are following everything there.

     

    Can't you just give information from Eset,

    why our application (and site)

    are being detected as PUA.

    I will FIX anything they want (we already removed all ads and banners).

     

     

    Thank you for understanding our business.

  2. Marcos,

    you just reply with:

    This is not a false positive but a correct detection of a potentially unwanted application (PUA).

     

    I wanted to write back, but you closed the topic.

    We are being detected as PUA

    because we had advertises inside our application.

    We REMOVED all ads from inside it, in order to not be classify as adware application.

     

    in this case,

    I would ask Eset,

    to re-analyze our software in order to clean this false detection.

     

    Thanks in advance!!!

    Josh

     

    [please leave the topic open, even after answering for couple of hours, just for allowing me to give a simple answer - thanks!!]

  3. Hello,

     

    I just re-open new topic,

    just in order to get relevant reply to my issue.

    Thanks for understanding.

    [ i will reply to this message ]

     

    I have tried to contact your support team at samples@eset.com

    several times about Eset detection falsely our product as PUA (a variant of Win32/RBPlus.A).

    it blocks our software and our webpage.

     

    Unfortunately, I haven't got a response for the past couple of weeks.

    I followed all the directions described on hxxp://kb.eset.com/e...tent&id=SOLN141,

    but still haven't got any response from your side.

    (also sent some emails from several different email accounts, but still nothing).

     

    I would appreciate your prompt response,

    as this issue hurts our product and business.

     

    Thanks again,

    Josh

     

     

    =========

    Marcos replied: (https://forum.eset.com/topic/2433-false-positive-mails-not-answered-for-more-that-1month/?p=13826)

     

    This is not a false positive but a correct detection of a potentially unwanted application (PUA). Detection of PUA is optional and it's at users' discretion if they want to have this kind of applications detected or not.

    Having said that and given that this is not a communication channel for disputing PUA detection, we'll draw this topic to a close.

     

  4. Hello,

     

    I have tried to contact your support team at samples@eset.com

    several times about Eset detection falsely our product as PUA (a variant of Win32/RBPlus.A).

    it blocks our software and our webpage.

     

    Unfortunately, I haven't got a response for the past couple of weeks.

    I followed all the directions described on hxxp://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?page=content&id=SOLN141,

    but still haven't got any response from your side.

    (also sent some emails from several different email accounts, but still nothing).

     

    I would appreciate your prompt response,

    as this issue hurts our product and business.

     

    Thanks again,

    Josh

  5. hello,

     

    I'm trying to understand why eset detects my application falsely.

    the application is detected:

    a variant of Win32 / RBPlus.A

     

    also, the website detects as:

    This page is identified as potentially unwanted.

    This web page is on the list of websites with dubious reputation or websites with potentially unwanted content.

     

    My question is,

    where can get more information and why this detections happens (BOTH DETECTIONS).

    I posted on `Malware Finding and Cleaning`

    but moderator closed the topic with showing some kind of review on our site. (how can it be that ESET base its data on review ?!)

     

    Thanks

  6. Hi,

     

    My Application just detected FALSELY as:

    a variant of Win32 / RBPlus.A

     

    And also,

    My Domain is FALSELY detected as:

    This page is identified as potentially unwanted.

    This web page is on the list of websites with dubious reputation or websites with potentially unwanted content.

     

     

    Can you please help, or explain why this happening?

    Thanks in advance!

×
×
  • Create New...