I used Eset from the days of v2.5 (remember that??). I remember reading Microsoft were using it, so I did too.
Some queries though:
On AV comparatives, KIS/KAV scores 99.9% protection. The balance was user dependent.
KIS/KAV is bloatware, although there endpoint software less so.
Why is ESS/EAV poorer in comparison? Has a higher compromise per centage?
I am using ESS with WRSA AV as a precaution against NOD letting something by.
I have a KIS licence but have chosen to use Eset because it is lighter on resources and is supplemented by WRSA.
But would welcome improvement in that protection. It is not what you keep out it's what you let in?
