[Install problem of ESS8.0]

Hi,

 

After I uninstalled Norton security 22, I was not able to install ESS in my PC.

An error occured with the code number 2503 and 2502 during the stage of registering when installing ESS.

Do you have any ideas about this problem?

(Windows 8.1 64bit)

 

Thanks.

[The process of 64 bit ESS is 32 bit?]

Very detailed explanations.

 

Thank you SweX, it's really helpful.

[The process of 64 bit ESS is 32 bit?]

Hello,

 

I installed a 64-bit ESS. But I saw a process "ekrn.exe" with a tag "*32". Does it mean that the kernel of the software is still 32-bit? Only the GUI process is 64-bit? I'm a bit confused.

[ESS v7.0.104.0 performance issues]

If you look at the performance test closer, they state: Use cases: visiting websites, downloading software, installing and running programs and copying data.

That said, it all boils down to what files are used. If large archives or heavily packed files are used, it will take longer to scan them. However, without knowing more details about this particular test, it's impossible to comment on it but generally said, in a real-world scenario ESET is one of the lightest AVs in terms of the system footprint. Also we've been continually working on improving performance of code emulation so that files are emulated by advanced heuristics much faster than ever before.

thanks for you detailed explanation.

 

i totally agree with what you've said.

and i just hope you can make it perfect.

[ESS v7.0.104.0 performance issues]

To be honest i think the performance related tests on any antivirus or security suite is going to be different on every computer its run on.

 

Over the years i have tried every one and they all have issues of some sort and there will be tradeoffs with them. ESS v 4.0 is by far the fastest version i have ran on my own pc, but maybe others would say that v 5 or 6 are quicker.

 

I have been running v7 since it came out on beta and its been better than its predecessor v6 by a mile for me and just keeping my fingers crossed that on release of the final version that its performance is on par with v4

i do agree with you that V4 is the fastest one i have ever used.and it will be great if v7 is faster than v6  .

i think it should be HIPS which mainly affects the performence.

[ESS v7.0.104.0 performance issues]

Check out

 

hxxp://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/avc_per_201304_en.pdf

 

Paints a different picture

 

out of 100 score Eset comes in at 99.4 for performance , and just a note that all those scores were tested on v6 ......... not the v7 "BETA"

well, thanks

 

but i'm a bit confused that why there's such a big difference.

[ESS v7.0.104.0 performance issues]

Hi

 

this is a resent test report by AV-Test

hxxp://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-7/mayjun-2013/

 

I think you really need to do sth to improve the performance  .

[question about Real-time file system protection]

There's no need to improve it as it's only a very basic module. Even the latest updates contained changes aimed at v4 server versions.

no need?

it can not be true!

then way it will be updated if you choose pre-release update in advanced option?

[question about Real-time file system protection]

hi,

i'm using version 6.316.and i find 'Real-time file system protection module' is quite old.it's '1006 (20110921)'.it seems it's been ignored for a long time.i think you should do sth on it.

Will it be improved in version 7?