[Dynamic Group Template - Computer Subnet]

29 minutes ago, MartinK said:

Could you please double check problematic devices are connecting, i.e. they had chance to report status? If so, I would recommend to modify DG template in a way that it will use operator "AND" and "not equal" conditions, even it should be equivalent on first sight?
Also please provide list of "IP subnetwork" values for all network interfaces (i.e. as reported by console for such devices) on devices that you expected to be present in defined dynamic group for verification of DG evaluation correctness.

The devices are connecting and reporting to the server.

I can't use the "AND" operator because in doing so, it throws a waring saying the operators are negated.

I can't provide a list of "IP Subnetwork" values because I am not going to know what they are.

Essentially, I want to make a dynamic group using a dynamic template to show me devices that are not in the office, ie: at the employee's home. As such I am not going to know what their home subnet is.

 

[Dynamic Group Template - Computer Subnet]

I have a static group called Workstations with 3 computers in them that are on 3 different subnets. Under the static Workstations group I have 3 dynamic groups based on their subnet as follows. However, the dynamic template is not working for the Remote Systems dynamic group.

-Workstations

     -Office 1

     -Office 2

     -Remote Systems

 

Office 1's dynamic template is:

Operation AND

     Network IP addresses . IP subnetwork = (equal) 192.168.1.0

 

Office 2's dynamic template is:

Operation AND

     Network IP addresses . IP subnetwork = (equal) 192.168.2.0

 

Remote Systems' dynamic template is:

Operation NOR

     Network IP addresses . IP subnetwork = (equal) 192.168.1.0

     Network IP addresses . IP subnetwork = (equal) 192.168.2.0

 

ESET PROTECT (Server), Version 8.1 (8.1.2209.0)
ESET PROTECT (Web Console), Version 8.1 (8.1.221.0)

CentOS (64-bit), Version 7.9.2009

 

Any ideas why the dynamic group template for Remote Systems would not working?

Would there be a better way to approach this?