SweX 871 Posted April 15, 2016 Share Posted April 15, 2016 Chart: hxxp://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart2&year=2016&month=3&sort=0&zoom=2 For the PDF see: hxxp://www.av-comparatives.org/real-world-protection-test-march-2016/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESET Insiders TJP 143 Posted April 18, 2016 ESET Insiders Share Posted April 18, 2016 (edited) Skim read but it appears ESS did rather well. Usual test champions did well.I can't believe how many AV's use Bitdefender's engine... Edited April 18, 2016 by TJP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweX 871 Posted April 23, 2016 Author Share Posted April 23, 2016 I can't believe how many AV's use Bitdefender's engine... Too many, IMO. ArcaBit Ashampoo BullGuard Chili Security Emsisoft eScan EstSoft (ALYac, Roboscan) F-Secure G DATA HAURI (ViRobot) IMEN Immunet Lavasoft (Ad-Aware) nProtect PSafe Qihoo Quick Heal (TS) SafeNSoft SecurityCoverage (SecureIT) SourceNext Tencent ThreatTrack Vipre TotalDefense TrustPort VirusChaser All these, plus some more. It really would be fun if some talented developers, small or big, tried making their own engine from scratch, it would be good for the market and the competiton. Nothing's wrong with BD's engine, it's even coded in assembly like ESET's engine IIRC, but seeing how many that goes with BD's engine, it starts getting ridiculous. But I am happy that ESET don't sell out their engine to 3'rd parties via some sdk, if you want to use an AV/AM with ESET's engine, then you go with ESET. Although, in BD's case, some of the products that use the BD engine is better than BD's own products, so in BD's case it may not be a bad idea letting others use their engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts