Jump to content

ESSP 16.2.13 Question


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Being  that those of us that have a ESET product for security purposes and being that we paid for a product that should function correctly why is it you cannot take 16.1.14 and rename it and call it 16.2.15?

That way we all get back a fully functioning version of the software we purchased and then spend the time developing that mess that was released when it shouldn't have been?

In past message you say this will be addressed later this year but do you really feel that is the correct path to making sure your clients have a proper functioning  security program? Reuse the product you already know to  be stable and  offer the features the customers were happy with.

Newer is not always better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Please provide more information about what issues you've had with v16.2.13. As far as I know, there are no known bugs unlike in older versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Marcos said:

Please provide more information about what issues you've had with v16.2.13. As far as I know, there are no known bugs unlike in older versions.

I may have used the incorrect terminology and I am referring functions & settings being removed on the version newer then 16.1.14. 
I am guessing ESET will say that 16.2.11 was released and functioning as intended  but that does not mean it fulfills the needs of the masses.
Was there any feedback from users before settings were removed or how did the developers come to the conclusion that removing settings was a good idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tmod said:

In past message you say this will be addressed later this year but do you really feel that is the correct path to making sure your clients have a proper functioning  security program?

Are you referring specifically to this statement: https://forum.eset.com/topic/37283-interactive-firewall-useless-since-162/page/2/?_fromLogin=1#elControls_170624_menu ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, itman said:

Not Marcos statement but the  issues all of us have had with the interactive side of things and how it didn't work. I know I had the list populated of what I wanted to allow and deny and after upgrading I had to start from scratch as the popup window that asks would not work then it would ask for items that were already in the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...