novice 20 Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 (edited) Hi, Just moved from 7.0.317 to 7.0.325 for a short time and back to 7.0.317 ( for some reason seems to work better) The change log for 7.0.325 says " new engine module" Just out of curiosity, what is the reason to introduce a "new engine module" in version 7, just 12 days before a major version release (V8)?????? Whoever decides to use a previous version (v7) would go to ESET site and download V.7.0.325 (the only one available) believing that is a well polished one, when in fact this version was "alive" for fix 12 days, with al bugs associated with a "new engine"!!!! So, why not keep 7.0.317 as the last "7" version???? Thanks! Edited November 11, 2014 by novice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweX 871 Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 AFAIK, Because the old build had not the updated engine inside in the installer, so every user downloading 317. would still have to download the engine update via the VSD update channel. By rebuilding the installer to include the updated engine and newer modules users does not have to do that after the install is done. Yeah it is well polished, I have used 325. and it worked as smooth as any other build for me. "with al bugs associated with a "new engine"!!!!" What bugs are you talking about? https://forum.eset.com/topic/3263-smart-security-not-updating-virus-signatures/?p=18876 The updated engine was released in september, when some users had problem updating due to heavy load on the update servers remember?....and this is now included in the 325. build so users don't have to download it via the VSD update channel after the install is done like I said above. P.S Unless I am mistaken, even if you went back to 317. the very same engine and module updates was downloaded via the VSD update channel after installing 317. so you still use the same engine and module updates that is inside the 325. build. This is what I think but I could be totally wrong of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 5,407 Posted November 11, 2014 Administrators Share Posted November 11, 2014 This is what I think but I could be totally wrong of course. Actually you are completely right Swex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweX 871 Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 (edited) This is what I think but I could be totally wrong of course. Actually you are completely right Swex Oh but look at that! Splendid Thank you Marcos. Edited November 11, 2014 by SweX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
novice 20 Posted November 11, 2014 Author Share Posted November 11, 2014 Are you saying that an updated 317 is the same like a freshly installed 325? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugk 397 Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 No, he is saying that: Unless I am mistaken, even if you went back to 317. the very same engine and module updates was downloaded via the VSD update channel after installing 317. so you still use the same engine and module updates that is inside the 325. build. (marked by me) Also have a look at this: What is the difference between a Virus Signature Database update and a Program Component Update (PCU)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Solution Marcos 5,407 Posted November 11, 2014 Administrators Solution Share Posted November 11, 2014 Are you saying that an updated 317 is the same like a freshly installed 325? Thanks! Not exactly. Version 7.0.325 contains some internal fixes as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugk 397 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 (edited) And here is the (I hope) complete changelog of the version 7.0.325: Changelog for 7.0.325.x Edited November 12, 2014 by rugk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts