itman 1,801 Posted June 21, 2019 Posted June 21, 2019 Background For some time, there have been forum postings regarding Eset's scoring in this test series. This has resulted in long and oftentimes mindless discussions on this issue. I am sure Eset has better use for its forum disk space. Solution Microsoft a while back adopted the use of published AV lab "transparency" reports to respond to its scoring in select AV lab tests. Their reports reflect typical Microsoft verbose detailing as only a concern with the resources it has to allocate to such an undertaking. Here's an example of a transparency report: https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE27O5A?ocid=cx-docs-avreports . I think it would be sufficient that Eset's report simply state the samples missed along with a brief explanation as to the cause for non-detection and corrective action implemented. Of course, there should be verbiage provided if Eset disputed the AV lab non-detection finding. Aryeh Goretsky 1
novice 20 Posted June 21, 2019 Posted June 21, 2019 Not a bad idea but I can bet that will never happen.
0xDEADBEEF 43 Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 Wow I didn't know that MS made such report. Thanks for sharing.
Recommended Posts