Janus 210 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Hi Suggestion.......: A second Eset Theme, (that you could choose eg. under Advanced settings) Argumentation : Beside the default color layout of the user interface it would be pleasant to have another Eset color theme layout . I have noticed that it can be a bit strenuous to the eyes to look at the white background especially when I have to navigate around the " Advance settings " . It would be pleasant with a more calm and damped color combination. Regards Janus jadinolf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janus 210 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Hi Suggestion ...... : Anti-Theft included in NOD32 Argumentation : I know that the Anti theft feature/service is a selling point for some of your top tier products, but i truly think that you will gain more in sales figures and goodwill if you let the " Anti Theft " feature be something that is incorporated in all of your products. Furthermore it will introduce a feature/service, for a product line like Nod32, that no other, for a similar product, will be able to offer for their users/potential customers as to my knowledge. Regards Janus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2naive 0 Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 Description: About ProxyDetail: It seems like ESET NOD32 Antivirus only support HTTP proxy in the configuration. Could you add a support for SOCKS5 proxy? HTTP proxy is limited in my situation and Update ofen fails with "Server not found". I know I can use some tools to convert it , but I hope it more convenient XD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince 0 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Hello I have a doubt. I have bought a eset nod32 antivrus yesterday from amazon.in but it is the model of 2016 how can I get the latest version using that licence key.I haven't installed it yet.☺ Pls help me. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted November 8, 2018 Administrators Share Posted November 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, Prince said: I have bought a eset nod32 antivrus yesterday from amazon.in but it is the model of 2016 how can I get the latest version using that licence key.I haven't installed it yet.☺ Please do not post in this topic intended for suggestions for future versions. Instead create a new topic in the ESET NOD32 Antivirus forum or whichever product you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Spartan 56 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Hi Marcos, I suggested to ESET in the past to give us an easier way of whitelisting by allowing us to multi select folders/apps in one shot rather than having to do it one at a time but they never replied to me or implemented it in the latest NOD32. See how easy it is to add items to the exclusion with checkbox multi selection method. this is just on example of many AVs out there which allow that Azure Phoenix 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted January 7, 2019 Administrators Share Posted January 7, 2019 Exclusions should be used with utter care and used only to resolve specific issues that could not be solved other way with the assistance of customer care. Each exclusion creates a security hole since excluded paths will never be scanned by ESET and possible malware won't be detected even if was otherwise detected and blocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Phoenix 11 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 11 hours ago, Marcos said: Exclusions should be used with utter care and used only to resolve specific issues that could not be solved other way with the assistance of customer care. Each exclusion creates a security hole since excluded paths will never be scanned by ESET and possible malware won't be detected even if was otherwise detected and blocked. Exclusions are a function in your product. Those possibles security holes are already there. So, why not improve the way exclusions are done like above? Super_Spartan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ISHOULI 0 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Le 14/08/2013 à 18h43, johngie a déclaré: Un petit problème: dans les versions précédentes, iTunes Mobdro TutuApp Edited January 22, 2019 by ISHOULI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted January 22, 2019 Administrators Share Posted January 22, 2019 9 minutes ago, ISHOULI said: Details : An anti Dialer Integration To The Current Security Package Would Be Awesome We are in 2019 when dialers have virtually already died out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leowun 0 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 In eset add vpn ever? Kaspersky has his own, although I don’t like Kaspersky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted March 25, 2020 Administrators Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 hour ago, leowun said: In eset add vpn ever? Kaspersky has his own, although I don’t like Kaspersky There are currently no such plans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Most Valued Members Nightowl 198 Posted March 25, 2020 Most Valued Members Share Posted March 25, 2020 2 hours ago, leowun said: In eset add vpn ever? Kaspersky has his own, although I don’t like Kaspersky Use ProtonVPN , it's good. I prefer the AV not to throw me an VPN like Kaspersky does. Super_Spartan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leowun 0 Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 I use PureVPN, it's not free, but has good service. And doesn't have connect errors with eset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eitanc 2 Posted October 15, 2020 Share Posted October 15, 2020 Hi, Please add an option to enable/disable an exception - meaning we will be able to add it *once* to the list and then either enable or disable it per need. Today we need to add it or delete it, which is not convenient. This way it will be part of the config - just either active or not, ready for re-use if needed, when needed. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foobar 2 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 Add READ/OPEN file operation to HIPS rules. I am far more concerned about something reading my files than writing them. Backups are there to handle writing problems, but reading well thats where all my secrets are! I saw this and was excited i could finally have this, (back when i was on linux i coded my own solution using fanotify but its a bit more annoying with windows and filesystem filter drivers or w/e) and was then sadly dissapointed. I would just like a way to intercept file open / read events and approve them on a per case basis on certain files, like say my password vault, ssh keys and whatnot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted April 20, 2021 Administrators Share Posted April 20, 2021 1 hour ago, Foobar said: I would just like a way to intercept file open / read events and approve them on a per case basis on certain files, Unfortunately HIPS does not support file open/read operations mainly due to performance reasons. In order to protect folders from viewing by unauthorized persons, consider using a folder encryption software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foobar 2 Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Marcos said: Unfortunately HIPS does not support file open/read operations mainly due to performance reasons. In order to protect folders from viewing by unauthorized persons, consider using a folder encryption software. Thats unfortunate to hear. Wouldn't it only effect performance if it were matching a lot of read rules? If so that would mostly be the users fault for just straight up setting it on everything. Perhaps a open rather than a read rule would be better performant? Folder encryption is a bit meh, my file vault and ssh keys are encrypted anyway. Won't stop a keylogger that i don't know is there, while something attempting to access my files and me getting a notification for it would be a clear giveaway that something is amiss, even on top of encryption. Edited April 20, 2021 by Foobar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Marcos 4,935 Posted April 20, 2021 Administrators Share Posted April 20, 2021 8 minutes ago, Foobar said: Thats unfortunate to hear. Wouldn't it only effect performance if it were matching a lot of read rules? No, it's monitoring itself which would cause performance overhead regardless of rules created. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ensto 0 Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 (edited) Description: Add advanced setting to be able to freely set the maximum size/used space of removable media that can trigger the automatic scan.Detail: The purpose is to prevent full scans of large removable media drives such as cased external drives but still have the functionallity to trigger full automatic scans for smaller drives such as USB sticks. Although there is some risk with limitations, my proposal is mostly related to performance than security. But it could also be a motivation to use automatic scanning for removable media as it provides better control over the function. Edited August 22, 2021 by Ensto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAKTAPAYA 1 Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 I would like to suggest the following changes if possible to make in NOD 32: 1. Sorry if my opinion is wrong in any way but why don't we put an option for complete system scan with in-depth scan choosing option on first hand in outer dashboard without going into the custom scan and choose for in-depth scan. Please kindly make a not that this way beginner user can run scan easily and cut down the steps to do so. This changes can, I think will make our ESET more user friendly. 2. Super_Spartan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitefern 5 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) @Marcos @Aryeh Goretsky Again, I am posting the request of disabling of the status/notification of "Missing Support for Azure Code Signing". Please give the end users the option. https://forum.eset.com/topic/37708-allow-disabling-of-status-missing-support-for-azure-code-signing/ This was suggested by @itman Edited September 26 by whitefern Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESET Moderators Aryeh Goretsky 366 Posted September 27 Author ESET Moderators Share Posted September 27 22 hours ago, whitefern said: @Marcos @Aryeh Goretsky Again, I am posting the request of disabling of the status/notification of "Missing Support for Azure Code Signing". Please give the end users the option. https://forum.eset.com/topic/37708-allow-disabling-of-status-missing-support-for-azure-code-signing/ This was suggested by @itman Hello, As I believe my colleague Marcos noted, this is already available in the business versions of the software. If you need that functionality for your organization, I would suggest reaching out to your local ESET office, distributor, or VAR, and see if you can migrate from a home to a business version. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitefern 5 Posted September 28 Share Posted September 28 3 hours ago, Aryeh Goretsky said: Hello, As I believe my colleague Marcos noted, this is already available in the business versions of the software. If you need that functionality for your organization, I would suggest reaching out to your local ESET office, distributor, or VAR, and see if you can migrate from a home to a business version. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky @Aryeh Goretsky Thank you for your reply. But that is not a acceptable answer. Why should I upgrade to "business" version when home is also a "business" product? It is not just me who needs it. It is everyone who needs it. The disabling of notifications/status is a little stupid. Don't you think?? You allow disabling of notifications/status of LICENSING which is a crucial part of the software. But you won't allow disabling the notifications/status of "Missing Support for Azure Code Signing", is just annoying and stupid. And calling it "Business" only option is not acceptable. Please provide this options for the users in the next update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESET Moderators Aryeh Goretsky 366 Posted September 30 Author ESET Moderators Share Posted September 30 On 9/27/2023 at 6:47 PM, whitefern said: @Aryeh Goretsky Thank you for your reply. But that is not a acceptable answer. Why should I upgrade to "business" version when home is also a "business" product? It is not just me who needs it. It is everyone who needs it. The disabling of notifications/status is a little stupid. Don't you think?? You allow disabling of notifications/status of LICENSING which is a crucial part of the software. But you won't allow disabling the notifications/status of "Missing Support for Azure Code Signing", is just annoying and stupid. And calling it "Business" only option is not acceptable. Please provide this options for the users in the next update. Hello, Consumer versions of the ESET's software are offered to small businesses with low seat counts because it is unlikely a business with 1-10 PCs has a full-time IT staff to manage an ESET PROTECT server. For that matter, they may not even have an Active Directory/Entra domain and WSUS servers; the entire network may consist of just a workgroup of PCs running Home or Pro editions of Windows, with one PC or a NAS providing file and print services. In this type of small office/home office environment where there is no dedicated information technology (or information security) staff, the operating system updates are handled by Microsoft. Handing control of this over to Microsoft ensures those PCs are running supported versions of Windows with the latest security patches. In other words, security is managed in the same way as for home users. Larger organizations have full time staff to manage PCs, and also make decisions about which versions of Windows at what patch level, and when those machines will receive updates. The editions of Windows they run are for the enterprise, and the organization has a robust management infrastructure in place to support that. In other words, they are making very careful decisions about risk, and managing their security to mitigate risk based on those decisions. That's the environment for which ESET's endpoint programs are intended. From the program code perspective, there's nothing that technically prevents a consumer version of ESET's software from running in a business environment or a business version of ESET's software from running in a home environment. Now, there may be licensing requirements that differ, but that is because programs are intended for use in the appropriate market segment. Enterprise management features are not going to be roadmapped for added to consumer versions. Now that your comment in the Future Changes to NOD32 thread has been answered, and your reply here in this thread has been replied to, I am going to redirect you back to your own thread on the matter. Any further discussion of this matter in this thread will be removed. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.