Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'performance'.
Hi everyone Once again we are experiencing slow network performance with ESET. We are seeing what has been described here (https://forum.eset.com/topic/22793-efs-network-performance-issues). Summarized, when we copy files (e.g. an ISO image) from any Windows Server 2012R2/2016 machine (most recent updates installed) to pretty much anything on the network (e.g. a NAS device), we get around 100 MB/s on a 10 Gbps Ethernet link. If ESS is uninstalled we see around 700 MB/s. We had the exact same issue last year. After countless tests and extensive troubleshooting with support, we upgraded to version 7.1.12010.0 back then. This kind of resolved the issue at the time, and we got around 500 MB/s instead of 700 MB/s - not perfect but much better than 100 MB/s. Many months ago we updated to version 7.2.12004.2 and to be honest, we kind of forgot about this issue. Lately we have noticed a lot of performance related issues and started troubleshooting again. And it turns out that ESS is once again the culprit. The ESS policy has not changed since the last time we experienced this problem. In fact, we added more exclusions. Despite all of this, we once again only get a fraction of the available network speed if ESS is installed. We immediately upgraded ESS to the most recent version (8.0.12003.0) yesterday, after we identified the root cause, but this has not made a difference. We are still troubleshooting and are doing lots of tests but there is no doubt that ESS is causing this. Is anyone else experiencing this? I would appreciate your feedback and would be grateful for any advice. Thanks a lot.
When running benchmarks on my 960 pro with internet security 188.8.131.52 enabled the performance is drastically reduced?. Paused protection = 2,224Mb/s read and 1,970 write. Enabled protection = 598Mb/s read and 1,122 write. I searched the forum for others with this issue and found a post from 2016 that was closed, people also reporting this loss of speed using SSD with Eset. In the post you hint at it being only the benchmarker being to fault. can someone tell me if this is true. Samsung magician latest version. thanks for your time in advance.