Jump to content

cdgmol

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cdgmol

  1. This feature (request) is not necessary anymore. Adding the address or domain of the second part (after "namens") to the ESS 'White list' is doing what I wanted. Some additional information. An example of the full sender address information of such emails: <service=milieudefensie.nl@mail3.suw15.mcsv.net>; namens; Ike Teuling <service@milieudefensie.nl> Until recently, I did not try e.g. @milieudefensie.nl in the ESS 'White list' because that domain is already in my Outlook 'Safe Sender List' and that don't work. So, it's nearly sure that Outlook is using the first addr
  2. I understand that you receive legitimate emails (probably a kind of newsletters) from email addresses like those you've mentioned and ESET's Antispam evaluates them as spam which is not what you want. ...... Hello Marcos, I thought (or at least was hoping) that my information was detailed enough to understand the situation. #1. Very important is: it is not a problem that is caused by or related to ESS. #2. Emails from unknown senders are directed/saved to the "unwanted" folder (that depends on my Outlook configuration). #3. Adding "once-only" sender addresses to the 'Safe Sen
  3. Please contact Customer care and provide them with examples of the emails that are incorrectly blocked. Maybe their sender has the IP address blacklisted due to sending out spam in the past and it might be safe to unblock it now. Hello Marcos, I have already had e-mail contact with ESET Support about this subject. It took many replies before the "supporter" understood the situation and what I was asking. The correspondence has Ticket ID: 23851, however it is in Dutch. His final response was that this feature is available in 'ESET Mail Security' (however, I could not find something lik
  4. I would like to have a "keyword" option for the white (and black) list of ESS. I have a few e-mail subscriptions where the sender address is different every time. That means that adding such an address or domain to the white list is useless. And unfortunately, every new e-mail is marked as SPAM and saved at that location. A few examples: service=milieudefensie.nl@mail3.suw15.mcsv.net service=milieudefensie.nl@mail91.atl71.mcdlv.net service=milieudefensie.nl@mail85.atl71.mcdlv.net service=milieudefensie.nl@mail9.suw15.mcsv.net What should be possible is adding the stable part of su
  5. Sometimes there seem to be duplicate rules and in that case I want to compare them. That has become rather difficult and annoying in v9, because you have to look at the full information in the column Applications. My suggestion is that a Details screen should be added and apart from OK or Abort, a Next and Previous button would be very nice. Note. The Edit screen don't show the application information, but perhaps could Edit and Details be combined.
  6. Triggered by the post of SCR (Posted 17 October 2015 - 08:24 PM), I tried (successfully) the following procedure: #1. Export settings. #2. With Notepad++ (or other editor), replace in that XML file the unwanted strings (including a trailing space) by "empty". #3. After saving, import that modified settings file. So, if there are many rules to edit, it is faster and easier than editing each rule manually. Note. The predefined rules have still long 'names', but normally you don't see them. But I think, there is no need to shrink that descriptions. Besides, there is no default (and nee
  7. So, having the rules set without 'allow communication for' and 'deny communication for' in future releases would be the first fix, plus having ESET's programs remember the column width would be the second fix. Both would be beneficial to have. I fully agree with that and much less (or not) with most other suggestions. Besides, the view at the FW Rules was OK in version 8 (and 7).
  8. If you go into the Scheduler in the GUI (Tools -> More tools -> Scheduler) straight after the install is finished and uncheck the checkbox for the "First scan" which is scheduled to run 20min after install, then it will not start automatically, and you can instead run a scan later on whenever you like. Thanks for your response SweX, but that don't change my "complaint" about this. And (of course) I know how to prevent things like this. But (re-)installing is a once in a year (or longer) operation and I (and other users) don't think about that pre-scheduled scan. So ESET developers, pl
  9. Thanks SCR for your link to this already reported issue. I overlooked this topic because I've only looked in the regular 'ESET Smart Security' section and not in Beta Products sections. And then "easy searching" for 'firewall' don't show that topic.
  10. I find that the screen with the Firewall Rules of v9 is a big degradation compared to the much more clearly and orderly screen of v8 (and v7). What should be done (at least) to improve the situation is: #1. In the left 'Name' column, the 'trailer' (Communication etc.) has to be removed. That will make the name of the process/program readable (again) without changing the column width a lot. Skipping that 'trailer' is acceptable because that info is already available in the Action column. #2. The screen size and all the column widths should be saved, so that next time the layout is the sam
×
×
  • Create New...