Hijin25

I did the test on another PC with Windows 10, and it's the same problem, jump alerts on the same sites. Both on Google and on internet explorer

Thank you for your attention. Excuse me, English is not my native language. I didn't quite understand his answer.

On the third attempt, it was activated correctly. I do not know if a momentary error was due or what, but it seems to have been solved. Thank you for your attention.

Sorry for the inconvenience, about 3 days to the date this message is appearing to me, usually when visiting microsoft sites. This happens to me both with version 10 of ESS and Kaspersky. But it does not happen with other antivirus and version 8 of ESET Smart. It happens in Chrome and occasionally with Internet explorer 9. Please, I am very worried about this behavior, which had never been presented to me before.

Regards, I was presented with an error during the activation of ESS 10. He informs me that a computer with the same name already exists in my account. I had never been introduced before. What could be causing this error?

I'm experiencing this with Microsoft sites both in internet explorer and Google Chrome, not so with Firefox. This only happens with version 10, not so with v8.

He led using ESET products continuously for 10 years, but due to the multiple problems of version 9, using the V8. But now I understand why he is declining both antivirus, want to be like others, instead of being unique.

Where the hell are notifications? Greetings, I again apologize for my bad English is not my native language. Today, knowing that the "new version" of ESET, was released the quotation marks because it is virtually version 9 interface with another color, I encourage install expecting the ridiculous amount of failures that present the V9 were corrected. But unfortunately this was not so, the work continues lousy present. But what really bothered me version 10 is the total absence of notifications, alerts do not update the virus signature, or the detected networks. I enter the configuration, which is horrible, and the interface section, appear to be active notifications, but I nothing appears. What is happening with ESET ?, why they are doing so badly.

I have been a user of ESET products for ten years, and has been sad to see how has dropped the product from the release of version 9, it is worrying as in most comparative antivirus products free license are above in scores. And instead of trying to correct this decline, assume second place, when once they were always in the pit. Pathetic.

Greetings, excuse my English. Today reinstall ESS 9 because I reported that the version of the virus signature was 14294, being in the database Virus Radar indicated the 14296. But it turned out that after installation now reports that the version of the virus signature is the 14286, October 15, version that does not even appear in the list of Virus Radar.

The problem persists, I use smart security. When it's not one thing it's another, version 9 eset is riddled with faults.

Greetings, I have noticed that the page does not update Virus Radar information since April 21, have knowledge of that incident?

Thanks for your reply, but I see that relates to my question. My question is, why the weight of the first update after the installation of a machine eset was 50 MB, and the second was 80 MB? He edited: I just did the installation on a third machine, and the weight of the first update was 50 MB. Then why in just a machine, having the same operating system as the other, the weight was 80 MB?

Greetings, sorry. But I doubt arose. Reinstall the operating system 2 pcs of my work, both used this eset smart 8 but happened that when reinstalling the antivirus size of the first update was around 50 mb in the first, and hours later, at reinstallation in the second computer, the size of the first update was over 80 mb. This is normal?

How safe it is to keep using ESS 8? Greetings, due to the multiple problems I've had with version 9 eset smart, still using the version 8, the problem is that my license is about to expire and I'm hesitating to renew it because do not know if I still have the same level of security . Thanks.

Greetings, pardon my English. Perform a clean installation of the latest version of ESS 9, the problem is that when I disable windows defender throws me an error; windows defender error: Operation Aborted (error code 0x80004004) Uninstall ESS, and windows defender is activated or deactivated without error messages. It is only with ESS 9 installed brand the deactivation error. I know I can defend before installing disable eset, but intrigue me the error message because not did before. Thanks in advance for your answers.

thanks for the clarification. I'm just having trouble with my dns, I think it's a matter of my provider, and researching I found something about DNS poisoning, I'll turn it to see if I detected something.

Greetings, sorry, I just want to know if this option found in intrusion detection must be enabled. Since it comes disabled by default.

I know, that's not the point, I just wanted to indicate that between cnet.com.

I also downloaded anything from cnet.com. I was just reported on a Latin American forum page Malwarebytes downloads redirected to cnet.com, and what ESET detected as dangerous site. I wanted to capture an image of the event and discover that it no longer detected.

Greetings, I just wanted to make a small question. Before, when you download something from cnet.com, ESS blocked page. But today I was not the same, eset allowed me to download from cnet.com without warning. That's because eset no longer blocks cnet.com, or something is wrong with my antivirus? Thanks in advance.

Again the problem of the two firewalls work at the same time is presented. I realize this issue because it passes my Internet navigation is impeded.

Of course it has restarted several times. Busy I mean full-screen programs, games, movies. If at 8:00 pm at which the task is scheduled, using a full-screen program is done, the task is no longer carried out until the next day at the scheduled time.

Here's proof that record keeping is not carried out as scheduled, since the program was installed. It only takes place at the scheduled time when the PC is not being occupied.

Although most cookies are harmless, it is known that can be used for the purpose of spyware, so I am surprised that Eset not identified in its analysis, as if it does AVG or BitDefender.