Jump to content

HSW

Members
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by HSW

  1. Hi, can someone say me in witch table i found the following thinks: - Computername, last Connection, FQDN, Serialnumber /// optional the primary keys to connect the tables if its not clear like computer_id /// also optional known problems of the pc In the past FQND and Serial was not list but with ESMC there are some new device informations, i hope this is now possible. I need this for a adjustment with a other system. ESMC Version 7.0.577.0 Thx and relaxed weekend
  2. I had also some clients with this, easiest way: Old Installer right click uninstall over context menu (after this all was clean)
  3. Yes like if you double click on the taskbar icon. (protection status)
  4. Hi, I would install ESET over our Kiosk System. Is there a way to open ESET and show the status after installation? Our Kiosk system can run different scripts (VBs, PS, BATCH) or CMD commands directly. When i start the egui.exe with CMD it only opens a new instance. Exists there secret parameters? Other posibility: Is the a way to check for status "reboot need" thx HSW
  5. Hi, after switch to V7 we have some Clients with the error "Device control is not fully functional". 1.) what is the difference to "Device control is not functional" 2.) a reboot dont help 3.) uninstall + reinstall help but error appears again later 4.) in 1 case it helps to unplug thunderbold dockingstation, reboot without and error was gone but appears today again. any idea?
  6. The problem was the last "rule" dont know why, without no problems with V7. Type - Action - Users -Severity -Time Disk Storage - Read/Write - ALL - Warning -Always
  7. i have identify the problem, the V7 Clients have a problem with the "old" policy i have create a new one and there are no problems. I dont know why this happens and why not instant. In my opinion it must be a problem with the database entry of the policy. The ESET customer support is to slow and bad so i try every time to resolve this alone or with the good forum support I can send you the old policy with PM. A question is if you see a possibility to export known devices from the old policy. (with sql or other ways?)
  8. Hi together, Since 1-2h we have more and more the problem that usb devices not get warned they get instant blocked by user (without showing the notification screen and without asking) In the log you can read blocked by user. We have only 85 V7 Clients Rest still V6.5 with this clients there are no problems. The phenomenon is, its work 1-5 times with the same stick and after this attemps it gets blocked. No restart or shoutdown helps. Any Info about this problem? We have the newest version of ESMC Server all "problem" clients have EEA (2 or so on EES) the Agents are also actualy. Normaly the usb policy allow some known sticks and all others gets warned but nothing gets blocked. This is a big problem for us i hope you can help quick.
  9. Ah thx, ok than i will upgrade the server and test some clients with upgrade the agents, in the past the EES or EEA dont make problems with upgrades only the Agent was a little bit tricky from time to time.
  10. I mean ESMC sorry missing S ^^, and iam still not shure if i can upgrade Server WITHOUT upgrade all clients after. Is it possible to use V7 Server and V6.5 Agents with all old policy setups? If yes i would upgrade and test some clients, if not i must wait.
  11. 4. dont have a testserver for this, i read there was a problem that V6 client policys not work with EMC till all clients have V7 agent -> is this fixed? normaly i upgrade my server if this makes problems -> restore but when all clients get problems i wait till all is proved. If upgrade server without touching clients possible i could test some install clients.
  12. We found out, its a router problem (https://www.zdnet.com/article/mikrotik-routers-enslaved-in-massive-coinhive-cryptojacking-campaign/) tricky monday
  13. It is a homepage not the clients. Eset reacts to the http of this side https is all fine. Its our own hp.
  14. Hi, we have many of this infection notifications since friday, could there be a bug? Different mashines and different routers. (private home office and different business locations)
  15. That has nothing to do with ESET. You can create a Uninstall V6 GPO (Group Policy) on Shutdown. And a new Install V7 on Start. (Download manualy and install over a own share) Or you make a script like me which load on start check for a new Version und prompt a user ask for Upgrade AND reboot.
  16. Thx for the command, there are many deleted users, could it be that eset use some LOGs from sharepoint or have some lock times like MS for RDP for example?
  17. Hi we actualy use: ESET Security 6.5.15015.1 (before ESET Security 4.5.15022.0) After some time the ESET Server count the number of persons wrong (more than exist) -> Server is "Microsoft SharePoint Foundation 2013" on a Server 2012 R2 (Domain Login deactivate on the SharePoint pages) How count ESET the users, and how long it counts the users, exist there a cache or a timebase lock like MS do? I use a PowerShell script to read out all the users and there where some deactivate accounts, could this be a problem? We delete them now but ESET still counts more users than exist. Can i do something to "reset" the users and count new? thx for help
  18. not realy useable only "DirectoryString" is useable. Unique identifier like objectSID or objectGUID not working or useless Output but thx for the tip
  19. thx i test this. btw. you description is wrong: Server connection Settings •Login - Type the login credentials for your domain controller in the format DOMAIN\username. ----->>>>> USERNAME@DOMAIN.XX
  20. There must exist some data, because the static folders with AD sync exists. So please help.
  21. Hi, i try to make a comparison from 3 Systems if clients exist in all 3 (AD, a SoftwareControl and ESET) - SQL based I need a unique identifier. PC Name is not 100% In AD there exist objectSID and objectGUID, any idea if this also exist in ESET, if yes witch SQL table? thx
  22. THX Yes please improve this in future versions.
×
×
  • Create New...