Stoyan Dimov

Hi Marcos, Thanks for your reply. cls is working more or less as expected. The issue is odscan performance. I expected it to be faster than cls but odscan command take more than 7 times longer than cls to scan the same set of files (1.1MB total). Something I forgot to mention: Report in the GUI says that odscan task completed in a second but actual command on the system takes 25+ seconds. cls command around 3 seconds. Here is the output of the commands: # time /opt/eset/efs/sbin/cls/cls virus ECLS Command-line scanner, version 1.1.1.0, Copyright © 1992-2022 ESET, spol. s r. o. All rights reserved. Module loader, version 1077 (20200622), build 1140 Module perseus, version 1587 (20220322), build 2287 Module scanner, version 25087 (20220411), build 53119 Module archiver, version 1329 (20220314), build 1409 Module advheur, version 1215 (20220126), build 1224 Command line: virus Scan started at: Mon Apr 11 08:10:00 2022 <snip> Scan completed at: Mon Apr 11 08:10:00 2022 Scan time: 0 sec (0:00:00) Total: files - 3, objects 9 Detected: files - 2, objects 2 Cleaned: files - 0, objects 0 real 0m2.981s user 0m2.890s sys 0m0.061s # time /opt/eset/efs/bin/odscan --scan --profile=<LocalProfile> --show-scan-info virus { "type":0, "session_id":13, "log_name":"ndlUCYyoM" } real 0m25.446s user 0m0.081s sys 0m0.009s Regards, Stoyan

Hi all, I am evaluating ESET Server Security for Linux. I get much better performance with cls (3.5s) that with odscan (25s) while scanning the same set of files. On another system I am evaluating ESET EndPoint Protection for Linux. It doesn't have cls so i cannot compare but odscan takes less than a second. I've created new profiles on both hosts and I think they are the same. Any idea why odscan on the host running ESET Server Security for Linux might be so slow? Regards, Stoyan