Jump to content

j-gray

Members
  • Posts

    620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by j-gray

  1. Deleting the data.db file broke the sync entirely, so I restored it.

    I removed and recreated the ADScanner directory, which essentially cleared the cache, started fresh and got everything sync'd correctly.

    Unfortunately, it seems to have broken again and newly sync'd workstation objects are going into Lost & Found again. Still no errors and still does not appear to sync all the workstation objects that it's finding.

  2. Best I can tell, the sync appears to have broken, despite showing no errors in the logs. Any of the more recently migrated systems are going directly to Lost & Found.

    Is there a way to flush the cache and make it start clean? Can I simply delete the 'data.db' file and rerun the sync?

  3. We've just migrated to the cloud and implemented the Active Directory Scanner. I'm having an issue where around 180 enabled/active workstations are being sync'd to Lost & Found instead of the correct Cloud OU.

    Some of the workstations in 'X' OU are successfully sync'd to the correct corresponding 'X' OU in the Cloud. Others in the same 'X' OU are going to Lost & Found.

    The sync is running successfully. No errors are shown in the adconnector log file. I've run several manual syncs, as well but still no change. I've verified the hostnames and FQDN are correct between AD and the Cloud console.

    Is there any way to tell why some workstations are not going into the corresponding Cloud OU?

  4. @Peter Randziak Ok, if I understand correctly, you're saying that the Bridge can cache updates (modules, product updates), etc.) for OS X as long as the requests are via HTTP and not HTTPS? If that's the case, then great.

    The documentation is a bit confusing, then, as there's no mention of HTTP traffic and the only list of supported products I could find were Windows and specifically not OS X.

    Thanks again for you help. I appreciate your presence here, as well as the other ESET folks.

  5. @Peter Randziak Thanks for the reply. The document you linked looks like firewall info, so does not appear to be relevant.

    ESET's bridge documentation, lists support only for Windows platforms and states specifically, "ESET Bridge does not support HTTPS traffic caching for ESET security products (and their versions) not listed above—Linux/macOS security products and earlier Windows security products."

    I'm primarily interested in caching downloads and updates, but from everything I read, only Windows and Linux clients are supported. Meaning that we can't cache anything for OS X clients.

  6. Also curious why the AD Scanner requires the 'Agent GPO Deployment Script' in order to run?

    What purpose does it serve?

    For reference, here's the error presented when the file is not present:

    2023-09-01 10:52:31.8371 ERROR ActiveDirectoryScanner Program failed with error System.Exception: Please ensure GPO configuration C:\adscanner\ActiveDirectoryScanner\install_config.ini is present.
       at ActiveDirectoryScanner.GPOScriptLoader.LoadConfigruation() in d:\jenkins\workspace\ADScanner\src\Products\RemoteAdministrator\Src\Tools\ActiveDirectoryScanner\ActiveDirectoryScanner\GPOScriptLoader.cs:line 187
       at ActiveDirectoryScanner.Program.Main(String[] args) in d:\jenkins\workspace\ADScanner\src\Products\RemoteAdministrator\Src\Tools\ActiveDirectoryScanner\ActiveDirectoryScanner\Program.cs:line 294
    2023-09-01 10:52:31.8682 INFO ActiveDirectoryScanner Program finished

  7. First time running the scanner throws a fatal error, "The required library hostfxr.dll could not be found." and directs to the .Net Core runtime page. So I downloaded the Core Runtime 7.0.10 version (documented as prerequisite).

    On the second run, I got the same hostfxr.dll error. Google indicated that the .Net Runtime 'Hosting Bundle' (not x64 package) install fixes this issue.

    After installing the 'Hosting Bundle', on the third run it finds the 7.x framework, but then I get, "To install missing framework, download..."

    This download link points to the .Net Core 3.1 runtime, which is flagged by Microsoft as end of life and no longer supported.

    Is this the case that Active Directory Scanner will only run with a deprecated version of .Net?

  8. So it turns out that the "RUN_LOOP_ERROR RUN_LOOP_TIMEOUT (2)" log entry is significant after all and apparently indicates a timeout in the license check process, and thereby successful activation (or not, in this case).

    Support indicated that 10s is the default timeout. I've had to increase the timeout to 90s for OS X clients to remain activated.

    So in the eiconnector.policy.ini file we added a line: EndpointLicenseRequestsTimeout=90s

    I'd really like to understand:

    1. Why does this issue only affect OS X devices and not Windows PCs on the same network?
    2. What is the client attempting to contact for the license request? Is it EI server, EP server, Internet?
    3. Why must the client check activation status multiple times every day? It seems excessive if it's already successfully activated and the license is good for however many months.
  9. @jimwillsher We're in the same boat and contemplating a move and beginning to look into it.

    I'm curious if there was a specific catalyst for your move? Aside from platform management, updates, etc. do you find any different features or advantages?

    Appreciate any feedback.

  10. 1 minute ago, avielc said:

    Our server has been updated to 1.11.2872 a while ago (I think a week ago)
    Didn't see any notification for Server update anywhere. 
    So I'm not sure how the automated update process actually pushed 1.11.2878 to some clients. 

    Quick update - You can't overwrite 2878 with 2872 installation task. - it must be removed first before reinstalling. 

    We've been on .2872 for a few weeks, as well. I only noticed the update as it was flagged in the EP Console on the clients as having a newer version available, seen in each clients' list of "Installed Applications". And when I looked at the 'Software Install' tasks, the newer Connector version was available as an option to install. It has since been removed and is no longer available/visible in the EP Console.

  11. 6 hours ago, Peter Randziak said:

    P.S. A general recommendation is to update the EI server first, then the EI connectors.

    Yes, this is why I was looking for the server download. The clients all showed the update available but the server had not been updated.

    So what happens when auto-update causes the connectors to update before the server has been updated as in the case of  @avielc?

    This is a perfect example of why we cannot rely on the auto-update feature.

  12. ESET Protect is showing a new version of the EI Connector and the software install tasks are also showing 1.11.2878.0 available.

    However, I'm not finding the updated server version on the download page. The latest available for download is 1.11.2872.0

    Also, the changelog only indicates:

    • Fixed: Performance issues
    • Fixed: Reliability issues

    Are there any more specifics available for this version?

  13. @Peter Randziak I have a question that support hasn't been able to address. I'm frequently finding that on the systems that have failed to activate repeatedly, when I go through the steps to enable ECP logging, the same activation task completes successfully when ECP logging is enabled.

    Essentially, the steps are bootout com.eset.protection.plist, edit the two license files, pkill licensed then bootstrap the eset plist.

    Something in this process allows the activation to succeed. Any thoughts what specifically might affect this?

    Thanks again.

  14. 17 hours ago, labynko said:

    After upgrading to ESET PROTECT 10.1.24.1, dynamic groups stopped working on machines with the old version of ESET Management Agent 8.0.1238.0.

    Maybe someone knows how to solve this problem?

    I would expect if you upgrade the agent to the latest supported version that everything will work as expected. EP v8.0 is already end-of-life. I would not expect an agent that old to work flawlessly with the latest version of EP.

    Per ESET release notes, "We recommend using the latest ESET Management Agent version to fully manage the latest version of ESET security products and their features."

    Is anything prohibiting you from upgrading the agents?

×
×
  • Create New...