Jump to content

comunic

Members
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by comunic

  1. hi all,

    i wanted to know how to manage the first analysis, following the EEA installation through the agent.

    I deploy the agent and then the EEA, with a task.

    After the EEA installation it runs a first analysis, while it is not checked in the task planifier of my policy (based on the template "maximal security")

    And after this first analysis, user have to check what kind of action he wants to do (clean/suppress/nothing), i just wanted to do a "strict cleaning"

    thank's !

  2. hi,

    yes i will do it that way :

    i need to send to my client or technician a script related to one and only one client (i can't take the risk to have a new "unknown computer" and we can't see the public ip in the console, and we can't insert a static group in the live installer)

    so i will create a unique certificate for each client, in relation with a dynamic group.all the dynamic groups will have the lost and found as parent group.

    now if a have hundreds of dynamic groups, i need to know easily if a new computer appear, what client is it.

    so i will now have to check all the dynamic groups..

    all of this to finally put the good client in the good static group, with the good policies, tasks, licences...

  3. Hi 21jags,

    it's ok for to manage dynamic groups, but nothing on it (like a specific marker) make possible for newly installed agent to join them automatically.

    We could insert a marker in the agent installer, and make it recongized by a dynamic group.

    for example, if i installed agents on remotes and branch office, nothing make me able to reconized which computer is on which place with dynamic groups.

  4. Thank you to post about this problem, i've made a post and i have no answer from the eset team.

    it is essential for me to have the public ip of the remote devices, because the ERA server is hosted in a datacenter, and it's a good thing to identify the devices with their ip address.

    Why the hell it is so complicated to collect this public ip on the console ???

  5. I Jim,

    no prolbem for me about management of tasks after upgrading to 6.3.

     

    BUT i see that the console is still unable to show the public ip of remote devices.

    What is the interest to see a lan IP ???

     

    Now it's been one year i am waiting for this, and i see that 6.3 is still not as good as v5 was...

    i will now try to find another antivirus editor to migrate 1000 computers, i hope i will find an editor taking care to client's complains.

  6. i tried both local path and url hxxp://, the result is the same in the log file :

    2015-02-25 09:49:21 Error: CSystemConnectorModule [Thread f98]: SoftwareInstallation: Installation command exited with (0x667): (0x667), Argument de la ligne de commande non valide. Consultez le Kit de développement Windows Installer pour une aide détaillée de la ligne de commande
    (the OS is a french OS)
     
    it says that the argument is not good, i just put the /quiet on the command line argument on ERA.
    the installation with a cmd command run well localy with the c:\xxx.msi /quiet
  7. Hello

    i'am exactly on the same case, and yes we will have to manage two different machines, one for the old era v5 and one for the news era v6, during the time of the migration for all clients.

    and be careful you can do nothing with era v6 on client v5, no management, no tasks...

     

    The easiest way is to personnalise the era srcipt to deploy the agent silently and after it you can push install the v6 client.

  8. HI all,

    I just trying the brand new ERA V6 and have succesfully deployed the agent and the new eset endpoint antivirus trought the console.

    I was trying to deploy other msi package for exemple 7zip but the task always failed, as is it works installing it whith a cmd command line and the /quiet option localy on the machine.

    Is it a limitation of ERA, to deploy only ESET packages or is their someting i miss to succesfull deploy msi, which should be very helpful !

    Thank's for your replies

×
×
  • Create New...