Jump to content

tbsky

Members
  • Posts

    231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by tbsky

  1. 1 hour ago, Marcos said:

    Since the update files between product versions may differ, it is not possible to merge mirrors created for different product versions.

    What I meant is that if you use the mirror tool create a mirror for Endpoint v11 for instance, you can use a batch files to copy the files to c:\www\c:\www\nod32-update\eset_upd for instance so that you don't need to reference the version in the update server path on clients.

    Hi:

         we don't care what the url is (with or without version number). the problem is we need multiple policies to set the correct url path to multiple eset client version. it is easy to solve as I said but Eset didn't do it.

        Eset update with Eset server will download update files automatically with correct version. why can't this be done when update with mirror server?

  2. 3 hours ago, Marcos said:

    While the mirror tool creates mirrors for particular product versions in separate folders, you can use a batch file to copy files from a particular folder to c:\www\c:\www\nod32-update\eset_upd or whatever the home folder is or user another way to sync the content of the two folders.

    Hi:

       I want to create the batch file as you said. so this time I carefully compare ep9 and ep11. most file names  of them are different (so no conflict). but there are four files with the same name and different content. could you tell me how to merge the four files to one directory? thanks a lot for help!!

    >diff -rqu ep9 ep11  | grep -v ^Only
    Files ep9/dll/nod3852.dll.nup and ep11/dll/nod3852.dll.nup differ
    Files ep9/dll/nodAFA3.dll.nup and ep11/dll/nodAFA3.dll.nup differ
    Files ep9/dll/nodC2A5.dll.nup and ep11/dll/nodC2A5.dll.nup differ
    Files ep9/dll/update.ver and ep11/dll/update.ver differ

  3. 3 hours ago, Marcos said:

    While the mirror tool creates mirrors for particular product versions in separate folders, you can use a batch file to copy files from a particular folder to c:\www\c:\www\nod32-update\eset_upd or whatever the home folder is or user another way to sync the content of the two folders.

    Hi:

       this is news to me. I had compare directory content of ep7/8/9/10/11, and there are many different files. I don't know they can be merged into a single directory. then why not let mirror tools itself to do the merge?  would Eset consider add a parameter like "-g" so content could be merged and policy can be simple for every Eset version?

  4. On 4/12/2024 at 2:22 PM, Marcos said:

    Unfortunately it is not clear what you mean. The point is Endpoint 11 should update from a v11 mirror, Endpoint v10 from a v10 mirror, etc. To create mirrors for different versions of ESET products, use the ESET Mirror tools which does it.

    I am sorry. I thought it was very clear. no problem to create the mirror. the problem is how to push the mirror path to client.

    every time when eset version upgrade, the mirror location path need to change, that's fine.

    but the policy also need to modified to the new path, that's very bad.  we don't need a path policy like below:

    hxxp://nod32.example.com/nod32-update/eset_upd/ep11 (the path policy need to changed for every eset version)

    we need a path policy like below:

    hxxp://nod32.example.com/nod32-update/eset_upd  (and client should append ep7,ep8,ep9,ep10,ep11 automatically)

    or a path policy like below:

    hxxp://nod32.example.com/nod32-update/eset_upd/ep%eset_version% (a server marco which push the correct path to client)

     

     

     

     

     

  5. On 4/6/2024 at 5:25 PM, Marcos said:

    We recommend creating a mirror using the ESET Mirror tool: https://help.eset.com/protect_install/11.0/en-US/mirror_tool_windows.html

    Endpoint v11 should update from a v11 mirror, etc.

    We'd recommend using ESET Bridge as a proxy instead of using a mirror if at least one machine in the network is connected to the Internet.

    the mirror location policy is poorly designed. I hope it can be changed since v7,v8,v9,v10, and now v11.

    currently I need to use "hxxp://nod32.example.com.nod32-update/eset_upd/ep11" for win10/win11 and

    "hxxp://nod32.example.com.nod32-update/eset_upd/ep9" for win7.

     

    the mirror location policy should be auto-completed by eset version.

     

  6. Hi:

       we have a customer with endpoint antivirus 11.0.2032.0. they said they can not open some excel files at an old nas. I remote login to one of these pc and found the situation is very strange:

    1. only some excel files can not open.  most files are ok.  excel (version office 2019 installed at win11) said it can not find the file.

    2. the file can be opened if disable eset. I try to find out which option is affecting. and I found I need to disable "real-time file system protection" => "network drives"

    3. I try to access the file with UNC path or mapping the path to a disk number (like P:). the result is the same.

    4. eset didn't report any thing when excel can not open the file.

    5. I copy the file to local disk or to another file server, the file can be opened correctly.

    6. I downgrade to 10.1.2058.0 and everything is fine.

     

  7. On 1/11/2024 at 4:45 PM, kapela86 said:

    @Cody_Klamann Hi, I just wanted to know if you resolved this? We're going to use device control in the same manner as you to block optical disks, usb disks and phones.

    we had test device control years ago. eset design seems like put a "No Entry Sign" at the road.  if the program notice it and obey it then the rule will work. for example if eset block usb device, windows file manager will obey it, but some iso burning tools still can write to usb drive. there are other similar control software which can "block the road". I don't know if Eset can catch up and do better device control in the future.

  8. 15 hours ago, FRiC said:

    Just upgraded to ESET PROTECT on-prem 11, and the single Windows 7 computer in my domain retained the versions as previously: ESET Endpoint Security 9.1.2063.0, and ESET Management Agent 10.1.1292.0.

    Other computers are already on EES 11.0.2032.0 and Agent got upgraded to 11.0.503.0.

    Hope this helps.

    Thanks for the confirm. so it seems works. but ESET may refuse to support this kind of configuration if I understand the release notes sentence correctly: "REMOVED: Windows 7/8/8.1 support".

    It's strange ESET forum administrators won't answer questions like these which need to clarify  support status. maybe I needs to create ticket.

  9. Hi:

       my windows eset endpoint was version 10.1.2050.0 with auto-update enabled.  today I worked at no-network environment for long time. when I have internet I click the "check update" at endopint GUI. I just want to update module/definition but I found eset update itself to version "10.1.2058.0" and ask for reboot.

      I check the forum and found "10.1.2058" was just released. I thought a new release would wait at least a month for "auto-update" procedure.  is there something wrong at eset release server?  would  "check update" manually cause endpoint to upgraded to newest release?

  10. Hi:

      today I got ESET Knowledgebase Support News about support policy change.

     so I check again about the current windows OS support policy at https://support-eol.eset.com/en/policy_business/os_support_charts.html

     the chart didn't mention about windows LSTC versions (like win10 1809 LTSC,  win10 21H2 IOT/LTSC).  these versions need to take care like related windows server versions (windows 2019, windows 2022) which has 10 years support by Microsoft. we have many customers using win10 IOT/LTSC. there will also be W11 IOT/LTSC at 2024.

    currently there is no problem about ESET and windows LTSC. but I hope the situation can be clarified. (like windows 1809 with Eset 10.x is not supported by the chart but they are supported by Microsoft and currently 10.x works fine on 1809 LTSC)

     

  11. 5 hours ago, Marcos said:

    Th

    This is not possible. Unlike running a software install task when the program is installed via the Windows Installer (msiexec.exe), auto-updates are installed by the program itself by assembling files using differential update files without the use of Windows Installer which stores its data (including the installation date) in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall.

    I don't understand. the installed eset endpoint product version is also at that registry place (eg: DisplayVersion). if the registry key "DisplayVersion" can be modified via auto-update  to correct value, why not modify "InstallDate" at the same place also?

  12. 12 minutes ago, Marcos said:

    Could you please provide a screenshot for clarification?

    I don't know why but I can not upload screenshot. the forum told me "There was a problem uploading the file. Please contact us for assistance"

    the installation date is the same at windows and eset-protect (both show installed at May). maybe you can check you own computer to see if the situation is different than mine.

  13. Hi:

        today my computer get notify it had install eset endpoint version 10.1.2050.0 and need reboot.

      so I reboot and check the eset-protect console to see what's the situation of other computers.

    I saw my eset endpoint was installed at May.  the new agent installed date is at September which seems correct. but Eset endpoint didn't update installed date.

     

  14. 9 hours ago, offbyone said:

    From what I found here:

    Documentation

    it really seems that you have to create different policies for different product versions:

     

    @offbyone

        I got different answers from forum and support ticket. but none of them can give me further response. so for safety now I create two policies for EP9 and EP10. that's sad situation but I can only live with it.

     

     

  15. Hello @emilota

        I understand maybe you are only responsible for technical issues. but could you forward my request to staff who can answer the question?

       this week we have talked about the new price to some of our customers.  with the price ESET has weakness below:

    1. local distributor stop Campus Program this year. so students/teachers will now use other products. (I think they will go back to sophos, eset got campus market share from sophos these years here.)

    2. ESET is no longer recommended by TSMC supply chain. I don't know who should be responsible to renew the certification. but many of our customers are at TSMC supply chain.

    3. Japan auditors often said they didn't know the ESET brand(most of them use Trend Micro). I was surprised about this. I thought ESET has some market share at Japan, but it seems not the case.

  16. On 4/17/2023 at 3:22 PM, emilota said:

    Hello @tbsky

    3 years licenses are available, however pricing policy and specifics (e.g., margin, discounts) might differ per region. Regarding the MSP program and benefits, find more details here or reach out to your local ESET distributor.

    Hi:

        we got no response from our local ESET distributor. since our regional price are now doubled compared to worldwide, we are seeking other ways:

      1. find other distributor to become MSP. is it possible?

      2. buy licenses from other country. we will need to pay extra tax fees but it is still cheaper.

×
×
  • Create New...