Jump to content

NALG IT Admin

Members
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    United Arab Emirates

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. We are an enterprise company and we've been using Eset End Point protection since 4 years now with a good satisfaction level pertaining performance, protection and light on PCs. We are at a point to renew our ESET subscription and co-incidentally came across the link https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/endpoint-protection-platforms/compare/cylance-vs-eset Where it says the below from some Users Cylance Vs ESET Comparison : Ø ESET are known to be light on computing resources (good) but VERY LOW efficacy against both known and unknown attacks (bad). Ø According to NSS Labs 2018/2019 ESET scored less than 90% in their overall protection while we scored 99.1% and 98.1%. Ø ESET users complain about Ransomware Protection being very poor. Check the following: https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/endpoint-protection-platforms/compare/cylance-vs-eset Ø ESET claim to use of Machine learning, but this may only be to generate the signatures. Ø Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence is Cylance’s bread and butter. In this space, Cylance is lightyears ahead! Ø Cylance stays ahead of the adversary on average by 25 months. I request to give us insights about Ransomeware protection level by Eset in comparison to Cylance Protect product. This will help immensely to make a beneficial decision for the organization it work for. Regards Perplexed IT Admin.
×
×
  • Create New...