Jump to content

BCS-E

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

BCS-E last won the day on April 9 2018

BCS-E had the most liked content!

About BCS-E

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    Netherlands

Recent Profile Visitors

611 profile views
  1. Yes, Yesterday and today. Multiple customers.
  2. My workaround was to disable the 'new device detected' notification for the user
  3. I need to block/reject/mark as spam shortened url's. Is this possible? I used content filtering in Exchange for now but i want to use EMSX for that so i can put it in ERA. Thanks
  4. Finally RBL is working. I changed the default values in the settings. The manual says that '0' means 'unlimited' or 'no timeout' so in my opinion they shouldn't be changed. But after changing it all worked on all Exchange servers with ESMX. hxxp://help.eset.com/emsx/6/en-US/?idh_antispam_engine.htm
  5. Hi, where is this rule? I've had a look at our mail transport rules, and *.class isn't listed - yet it is still deleting some office files. We are on 6.3.10005, with Exchange 2013 RU15. Chris *.class is under the 'Dangerous executable file attachments' rule. I disabled the 'Windows Executable' rule in 6.2 to prevent *.docx from blocking.
  6. Updated ESMX from 6.3.10005.0 to 6.3.10007.0 (on customer server) just to be sure. Enabled diagnostic logging for 24 hours but i am only seeing filtered messages in the log. Exported the log with Eset log collector to see if it is showing more info but its not. Or do i need to check the log somewhere else? The same message sent from 2 different ip's. Only one of them is filtered by Eset and found in the log. The other one should be filtered by RBL list.
  7. Received a spam message 10 minutes ago not filtered by ESMX 6.2. I know it should be 6.3 but several customers are on 6.3 and RBL is also not working. Nslookup replied correctly. So it shouldn't be in my inbox.
  8. RBL lists are very efficient in filtering. Almost every SPAM sender is listed on an RBL list. All SPAM mails not recognized as SPAM by ESET should be filtered by the RBL lists set in ESET. This is not happening. What is going wrong? I setup RBL lists on multiple mail servers with ESMX 6. None of them show mails filtered by RBL in the log. See attachment for settings. It would be nice if someone from ESET could answer. Multipe topics on the forum about RBL are not answered/solved!!!
  9. Hello, We recently installed ESET Mail Security for linux on a Ubuntu bases Zarafa mail server with Postfix. The configuration of postfix is as follows: myhostname = server alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases myorigin = /etc/mailname mydestination = localhost relayhost = smtp.provider.something mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 mailbox_size_limit = 0 message_size_limit = 25600000 virtual_mailbox_domains = domain_1 domain_2 virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/users.cf virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/aliases.cf virtual_transport = tothemailserver recipient_delimiter = + inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = ipv4 Mail delivered from outside is passed on to Postfix. If destination is not domain_1 or domain_2 a relaying denied message is generated. Otherwise mail is forwarded to the mailserver Localhost is secure. Only the Zarafa mail server delivers mail to Postfix. Zarafa has only authenticated access. We then followed the manual on the ESET site "ESET Mail Security & Zarafa 7 infrastucture". Unfortunatelly we followed it to blindly. Smooth installation en configuration. Postfix to port 2525 ESET receiving on 25 and forwarding to 2525. It was rather quickly up and running and we were quite happy with the results. Until several days later we found out we had created an open relay. By installing ESET MS in front the postfix server all mail delivered to postfix is from localhost and as such secure. > 99,9% of all incoming mail was nicely processed by ESET MS assigned a SPAM label and forwarded by postfix to the provider smarthost !!! In my opinion ESET MS should block non domain oriented mail with a relaying denied message. However ESET is turning to HQ for support and in the meantime we disabled ESET MS. What is the correct way to install ESET Mail Security for Linux ..... Thanks for reading.
  10. https://forum.eset.com/topic/4845-ela-deactivate-clients/
  11. I've created a dynamic group in a static (Active Directory) group for testing. The static group contains 4 clients. For testing i've created a client task which is triggered bij clients who join that dynamic group inside the static (Active Directory) group. The problem is that the task is applied to all clients in all groups. The task which should install Eset Endpoint v6 now removed all File Security and Mail Security applications form servers who are not in that dynamic or static group. Running on Virtual Appliance ESET Remote Administrator (Server), Version 6.1.450.0 ESET Remote Administrator (Webconsole), Version 6.1.282.0 What can i do to fix this?
  12. Push the agent with ERA manually or create a GPO to install it.
  13. And how do i activate clients with my security admin account and ERA Server? Clients are now already activated at (pushed) installation.
×
×
  • Create New...