New_Style_xd

I really enjoyed your research, on the subject it only makes it more certain that ESET is not good against ransomware. Unfortunately, ransomware and ESET do not have a good effectiveness over ransomware, unfortunately, nowadays.

The bad thing is that this test is already 1 year ago, nowadays other products have implemented new techniques in their products and new technology. eset livegrand example was implemented a short time ago. The kaspersky sandbox has been around for years. without counting other resources that exist.

I'll list what I like about the eset. 1- I like the product because it doesn't harm the performance of my system. 2- The way to update the new version of the antivirus I think is very good, it doesn't force you to install it automatically. 3- I like the eset icon on the taskbar with animation. 4- I like the details and information about when and which modules were updated. I'll list what I don't like about the eset. 1- In the product tests, the eset is below several others, even the free ones. I'm talking 10 years to today's date, it didn't stay at the top for long at first. 2- Dark mode has not been set. 3- It takes a long time to release updates and improvements to customers. 4- The product's interface is the same as version 9, it hasn't had a significant change for over 10 years. 5- Feedback from users asking for antivirus modifications and improvements has not been answered for several years. 6- The password vault could be free or already included in the internet security version as a program to be installed on the machine as kaspersky does with its password vault. 7- Could have a VPN, knowing that you always say that an AV has to be just an AV. 8- Does not have System Watcher module. 9- Program updater. 10- Have a research center here in BRAZIL, because there are several Malware that only works in Brazil as an example Malware that creates fake payment slips.

I don't think it's worth the cost. because it has free products doing the same role as ESET.

Guys passing by to inform you once again ESET does not do well in the test: Real-World Protection Test February-May 2022 https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/real-world-protection-test-february-may-2022/ Business Security Test March-April 2022 – Factsheet https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-march-april-2022-factsheet/ Once again we are behind other products much weaker than ESET.

Eset should look for more partnerships to improve the level of ESET, since only intel will not be enough even for the reasons you mentioned.

Good afternoon people, I've been trying to download and install AIMP for some time now, but ESET doesn't block it. I went to the AIMP forum and they say that there is nothing malicious in the program. Did I think ESET is blocking a FALSE POSITIVE? The vast majority of security products on the market do not detect it as malicious. link below: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a1360cf1a251233ae116e82590dfb87d8217cf7364c6a8c32f9ba231017e5737

Now what remains is for eset consumers, to wait for the eset team to inform you that the partnership is working 100% on the products of customers and domestic users.

I see that in the link you sent you always talk about ransomware that will protect and other things. So from the posts on other topics here on the forum, liveguard is not doing very well with ransomware. if this partnership was made, why is it not having positive results?

Good afternoon, ESET Team, I want to understand better about the partnership between the two companies? 1- What will change in ESET products? 2- What will be advantageous to have intel next to ESET? 3- Will the ESET product have better performance and better detection? If anyone can inform what in fact in detail what will be good for this set with the partnership with Intel?

What version of ESET are you using?

As your wise words you said it all: "No detection by LiveGuard. Again, what's the value of LiveGuard if it can't even detect ransomware?" I wonder if the value I pay for the ESET license is really worth it. Based on the information provided, I am not having protection as promised. liveguard did not detect. it is better to use BASIC version of antivirus or EIS

but if ESET reports that it protects more than 400K business customers and 110K protected by eset technology. as it is difficult as it can have a problem that already has a large base, I know it is not bigger than KASPERSKY, but it is already possible to do something about this subject. I think there is a lack of more marketing effort from eset for your product, because every youtube I see always talks about kaspersky with that her product becomes better known, what I want is for ese to be bigger.

That's not the protection I'm talking about.

As you said a part of HIPS that monitors the system. but not the other part. it has already been commented on the forum because eset does not have the System Watcher tool like other security software has. what's the problem with that? Will the eset software lose performance? that was never talking. I wanted to know why you don't put this protection?

But eset cannot be dependent on users, it has to test this option, it tests on several virtual machines or provides free antivirus for telemetry to check what is happening with antivirus on users' machines.

It could be the best answer, more difficult to understand that it exists in countries with bad internet as you said. I believe that everyone has a connection greater than 1MB. from the statistics, if you have countries below that, there are few and no need for ESET to maintain this type of verification.

But when it's zero-day ransomware, there's no way to detect it. only using System Watcher.

I want to know why there is this option to auto-update after dial-up connection is established? since many users do not use DIAL-UP in their homes?

That's what I don't understand, because the moderators ask to have activated the pre-launch if the product itself has not been set as default since it's one less problem to solve!

Description: Eset - Manage and schedule tasks. Detail: What is the reason motivated for a single person: Automatically update items or dialing establishment? How no one in mid-2021 has a dial-up phone connection.

so your ESET and setting for MANUAL update?

But as I see in most cases they send it to pre-launch. It wouldn't be better by default for the product to be right in the pre-launch, which I don't understand. I think I would have to define a position on that. because there are moments when I feel unsafe with this coming and going

I'm talking about this comment. So far I haven't had an answer here on the forum!

What you said has a few things that have to be punctuated: I watch the forum a lot, I notice that when people have a problem with ESET, the first thing people comment is to put it in the PRE-RELEASE to see if it was fixed. So what you said is not completely correct. I don't understand there's a time that and pre-launch another. Other times it is not better to use pre-launch. I don't understand.