
LCS
Members-
Content Count
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Location
U.K.
-
Mirek S. reacted to a post in a topic: Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator
-
katycomputersystems reacted to a post in a topic: Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator
-
katycomputersystems reacted to a post in a topic: Future changes to ESET Security Management Center / ESET Remote Administrator
-
I agree with this. Typical example yesterday, in which I was attempting to install ESET EAV on a machine. The report said "try installing the product locally." Did this and then realised that I was trying to install EAV when I should have been installing ESET File Security for Microsoft Windows Server. In this case, I would like to see the report come back and say something along the lines of "Detected O/S: Windows Server 2016. Compatible products are ESET File Security for Microsoft Windows Server." Like wise, if it were a linux system, then "Detected O/S: Ubuntu Server 16.04.4. C
-
Restrict the login of the Administrator account to specific IP addresses, but allow other accounts with 2FA enabled to login from anywhere. As we cannot delete, disable or rename the Administrator account, the only other option is to only allow the Administrator to login from specified IP addresses only. Andy
-
2FA - I've heard rumours that in the next version of ERA, we will also be controlling Endpoint Encryption as well. I feel that it is imperative that some form of 2FA is used to confirm our login details to ERA. The days of a simple userid (which everyone knows, because it displays automatically), with a simple password are long gone. Andy