Jump to content

igrikk

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About igrikk

  • Rank
    Newbie
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Location
    European Union
  1. cyberhash nice, what next ?? if i use 3 different browsers do i need then plugin for every browser ? its not about blocking ads only its about eset and errors in the program if you had read this topic, you would understand P.S. if you think ads are not viruses then you may think adware or spyware is not harmful too and maybe it should not be blocked by antiviruses too. And where does adware come from ? Right, from advertising sites which may pop-up whether you have popup blocker or not.
  2. @ PodrskaNORT good suggestion only tried to use "exclude" list. It seems to work now when adding *downloads* and *uploads* to the "allowed" list. But i still think it's a bug that adding those masks to "exclude" list hasn't solved this. @ cyberhash yeah.. tell me you will use second antivirus if it happens that eset don't recognize a virus
  3. Still its not the answer to my request. It is still a bug. If eset provides a functionality to exclude a mask from filtering it should work properly, which it doesnt. Whether i use it for blocking ads or not. Imagine me trying to block a domain for example "*loads.com*" and excluding another from filtering like "*downloads.com*". Those functions were put in the program for a reason, and they should work properly. Just because filtering web-addressess isn't commonly used by users doesn't mean it doesn't need fixing, when errors occur. Saying i should use another software to do exactly what a firewall and anti-virus software like eset should do is like saying that eset is not good enough. This should instead be reported and at least looked over by developers.
  4. In Eset Settings under "Web access protection": You can block some HTTP-Addresses by adding them to the "restricted" list and using a mask. For example using a mask "*ads*" will block any addresses containing "ads" and potential advertising. Hovewer this will also block addresses which contain "downlaods" or "uploads". For that reason, as i thought, there is another list which allows you to exclude addresses from filtering. However, if you add to this list "*downloads*" or "*uploads*", those addresses will still be blocked. So there is a problem for some reason "restricted list" has a higher priority then "excluded list" which makes no sence. Could you fix this bug in the following updates ???
×
×
  • Create New...