-
Posts
238 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Kudos
-
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in ESET Windows home products version 16.0.22 have been released
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium version 16.0.22 have been released and are available to download.
Changelog:
Version 16.0.22
NEW: Intel Threat Detection Technology support on supported processors NEW: Dark mode support IMPROVED: Refreshed GUI IMPROVED: Advanced setup graphical refreshment IMPROVED: Secure Data supporting dark mode + added support for ExFat format USB drives IMPROVED: Banking and payment protection Secure all browsers mode enabled by default Other minor bug fixes and improvements Known issues:
N/A
Upgrade to Latest Version
Upgrade my ESET Windows home product to the latest version
If your ESET security product has not updated automatically yet, you can enforce product update by manually checking for update in the Update panel or wait until it updates automatically.
Support Resources
ESET provides support in the form of Online Help (user guides), fully localized application and Online Help, online Knowledgebase, and applicable to your region, chat, email or phone support.
Online Help (user guides) Visit www.eset.com/contact to email ESET technical support -
TJP received kudos from Dimitris G in av-comparatives rating
I see AV tests as great for marketing purposes but for little else. Many of the highest scoring AV vendors have dedicated test departments to ensure they get great test scores. I'm yet to read a sponsored AV report in which the sponsor fared badly.
I've been around long enough to when Wilder's Security Forum was the go-to site; developers and researchers would post in threads about test results, security news, AV trends etc.
Eset Nod32 was the first test darling, then Kaspersky, then Avira, then Bit Defender and so on.
People would swap their AV based on test results which I never understood. Has a product failed you in the real world? If not, why change? Has the AV product caused issues with your PC? If not, why change?
It's like changing cars because one car is faster to 100 km/h (or 60 MPH) or quarter mile in a group test. What about all the other aspects?
I use Eset because its never failed me, never perceptively slowed my PC down, never deleted key files due to a virus definition update error and never blue-screened my PC.
I'll take zero false positives, low system impact, little to no feature bloat (an area some AV suites go overboard with 'extra' features) and zero real world issues vs a high test score with FP's, system drag and whatever else it takes to be #1.
-
TJP received kudos from Aryeh Goretsky in av-comparatives rating
I see AV tests as great for marketing purposes but for little else. Many of the highest scoring AV vendors have dedicated test departments to ensure they get great test scores. I'm yet to read a sponsored AV report in which the sponsor fared badly.
I've been around long enough to when Wilder's Security Forum was the go-to site; developers and researchers would post in threads about test results, security news, AV trends etc.
Eset Nod32 was the first test darling, then Kaspersky, then Avira, then Bit Defender and so on.
People would swap their AV based on test results which I never understood. Has a product failed you in the real world? If not, why change? Has the AV product caused issues with your PC? If not, why change?
It's like changing cars because one car is faster to 100 km/h (or 60 MPH) or quarter mile in a group test. What about all the other aspects?
I use Eset because its never failed me, never perceptively slowed my PC down, never deleted key files due to a virus definition update error and never blue-screened my PC.
I'll take zero false positives, low system impact, little to no feature bloat (an area some AV suites go overboard with 'extra' features) and zero real world issues vs a high test score with FP's, system drag and whatever else it takes to be #1.
-
TJP received kudos from peteyt in av-comparatives rating
I see AV tests as great for marketing purposes but for little else. Many of the highest scoring AV vendors have dedicated test departments to ensure they get great test scores. I'm yet to read a sponsored AV report in which the sponsor fared badly.
I've been around long enough to when Wilder's Security Forum was the go-to site; developers and researchers would post in threads about test results, security news, AV trends etc.
Eset Nod32 was the first test darling, then Kaspersky, then Avira, then Bit Defender and so on.
People would swap their AV based on test results which I never understood. Has a product failed you in the real world? If not, why change? Has the AV product caused issues with your PC? If not, why change?
It's like changing cars because one car is faster to 100 km/h (or 60 MPH) or quarter mile in a group test. What about all the other aspects?
I use Eset because its never failed me, never perceptively slowed my PC down, never deleted key files due to a virus definition update error and never blue-screened my PC.
I'll take zero false positives, low system impact, little to no feature bloat (an area some AV suites go overboard with 'extra' features) and zero real world issues vs a high test score with FP's, system drag and whatever else it takes to be #1.
-
TJP received kudos from Mr_Frog in av-comparatives rating
I see AV tests as great for marketing purposes but for little else. Many of the highest scoring AV vendors have dedicated test departments to ensure they get great test scores. I'm yet to read a sponsored AV report in which the sponsor fared badly.
I've been around long enough to when Wilder's Security Forum was the go-to site; developers and researchers would post in threads about test results, security news, AV trends etc.
Eset Nod32 was the first test darling, then Kaspersky, then Avira, then Bit Defender and so on.
People would swap their AV based on test results which I never understood. Has a product failed you in the real world? If not, why change? Has the AV product caused issues with your PC? If not, why change?
It's like changing cars because one car is faster to 100 km/h (or 60 MPH) or quarter mile in a group test. What about all the other aspects?
I use Eset because its never failed me, never perceptively slowed my PC down, never deleted key files due to a virus definition update error and never blue-screened my PC.
I'll take zero false positives, low system impact, little to no feature bloat (an area some AV suites go overboard with 'extra' features) and zero real world issues vs a high test score with FP's, system drag and whatever else it takes to be #1.
-
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in Where is Eset in the AV-TEST test?
So what are the reasons why you keep using ESET? I guess it's personal experience and not just test results.
-
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in Where is Eset in the AV-TEST test?
Since tests are quite costly, it's at vendor's discretion to decide in which paid test they will participate.
-
TJP gave kudos to peteyt in Any advantages for BETA testers?
Eset doesn't release full betas much. Sometimes there might be benefits but usually the main thing is trying something before it is released, checking for bugs and giving feedback. Anyone can generally join these betas.
Another kind of beta also exists for active forum users. These do include things like 15.1 and so on but often these betas will see new features before anyone even knows what they are.
This is ran by @Peter Randziak but as mentioned I belive to be considered you need to be a regular active forum user. There are sometimes benefits but I'm reluctant to really give much information as everyone using this beta has to sign an NDA
-
TJP gave kudos to Posolsvetla in Memory Usage
We cannot stop validating certificates.
We don't do it because some browser might do certificate validation incorrectly. We do it because if TLS scanning is active for a particular web site, a browser cannot validate the original certificate of that site. (Note: As already discussed previously, we validate certificates also in several cases when TLS scanning is not active for a web page in question.)
What would happen if we stopped validating certificates can be simulated like this:
As per https://help.eset.com/eis/15/en-US/?idh_config_epfw_ssl_known.html add the certificate for https://untrusted-root.badssl.com/ and set the Access action to Allow. This way, the server's certificate will be considered valid by our product with the same effect as if we didn't validate it. (Note: As already mentioned, the revoked certificates won't be considered valid even if configured so.) Then try to open that web site. It will succeed.
I managed to find a few links which might be helpful for anybody reading this forum:
https://medium.com/@ethicalevil/how-http-proxies-read-tls-traffic-from-browsers-f15364e91226
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/133254/how-does-ssl-proxy-server-in-company-work
https://docs.mitmproxy.org/stable/concepts-howmitmproxyworks/#transparent-https
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TLS_termination_proxy
According to Wikipedia, we use "TLS termination proxy" of "TLS Bridging" type in order to be able to do TLS scanning.
-
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in ESET Windows home products version 14.2.19 (hotfix) have been released
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium version 14.2.19 have been released and are available to download.
Changelog:
Version 14.2.19
Fixed: Bug fixes and optimizations Known issues:
N/A
Upgrade to Latest Version
Upgrade my ESET Windows home product to the latest version
If your ESET security product has not updated automatically yet, you can enforce product update by manually checking for update in the Update panel or wait until it updates automatically.
Support Resources
ESET provides support in the form of Online Help (user guides), fully localized application and Online Help, online Knowledgebase, and applicable to your region, chat, email or phone support.
Online Help (user guides) Visit www.eset.com/contact to email ESET technical support -
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in ESET Windows home products version 14.1.20 have been released
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium version 14.1.20 have been released and are available to download.
Changelog:
Version 14.1.20
Fixed: Webcam protection and Device Control issues on Windows 7 and Windows 8 Known issues:
N/A
Upgrade to Latest Version
Upgrade my ESET Windows home product to the latest version
If your ESET security product has not updated automatically yet, you can enforce product update by manually checking for update in the Update panel or wait until it updates automatically.
Support Resources
ESET provides support in the form of Online Help (user guides), fully localized application and Online Help, online Knowledgebase, and applicable to your region, chat, email or phone support.
Online Help (user guides) Visit www.eset.com/contact to email ESET technical support -
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in ESET Windows home products version 14.1.19 have been released
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium version 14.1.19 have been released and are available to download.
Changelog:
Version 14.1.19
Added: support for device association with myESET Improved: Other under-the-hood improvements and fixes Known issues:
N/A
Upgrade to Latest Version
Upgrade my ESET Windows home product to the latest version
If your ESET security product has not updated automatically yet, you can enforce product update by manually checking for update in the Update panel or wait until it updates automatically.
Support Resources
ESET provides support in the form of Online Help (user guides), fully localized application and Online Help, online Knowledgebase, and applicable to your region, chat, email or phone support.
Online Help (user guides) Visit www.eset.com/contact to email ESET technical support -
TJP gave kudos to Marcos in ESET BETA 13 ?
We've recently made 12.1.30.0 available for users in the ESET Insider program.
Also it is not clear what you meant by " I miss the success of ESET 2002 - 2007". Please clarify as to what you meant because ESET is a successful company with products being enriched with new protection and technology features on a regular basis.