Jump to content

kapela86

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kapela86

  1. 8 minutes ago, MartinK said:

    Currently it is not decided of the future, and even latest version is using CentOS7-based appliance, which is supposed to be supported until 2024 (i.e. much longer than mentioned CentOS8). We currently rely on fact that security patches are available, even for tomcat 7 which is part of official CentOS7 repositories.

    Just out of curiosity, what would be your preferred Linux distribution for future? Asking as there is not many "free" distributions guaranteeing reasonably long support and stability of environment for future migrations.

    If you want to stay with RedHat/CentOS, then maybe Oracle Linux?

    https://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/

    I personally prefer Ubuntu, LTS versions are supported for 5 years. Debian LTS is also supported for 5 years.

  2. On 12/9/2020 at 12:55 PM, Nono said:

    I hope I'm falling on the right thread for this ..

    Description: (Next) Up-to-date system to host the ESMC Virtual Appliance 

    DetailThe ESMC Virtual Appliance  is running under CentOS 7 with some higly outdated software (like tomcat 7 among others).

    What's the plan for the next virtual appliance version, knowing the recent information about the End Of Life of CentOS in 2021: https://www.cyberciti.biz/linux-news/centos-linux-8-will-end-in-2021-and-shifts-focus-to-centos-stream/ ?

    They just released ESET PROTECT, it's essentialy a renamed ESMC v8. I don't know what version of tomcat it uses.

    https://help.eset.com/protect_deploy_va/80/en-US/?va_upgrade_migrate.html

  3. I have a policy with some Endpoint Security settings and firewall rules that is assigned to dynamic group "Windows (desktops)". I also use this policy as a default settings in Endpoint Security installer that I use to install on computers in my organization. I just noticed on computers that firewall rules are duplicated, and upon further investigation I found out that first set of rules is applied from ESMC policy and second is from local rules that are created by installer. How can I remove those local rules without going to every PC and removing it manually?

  4. 1 minute ago, karsayor said:

    Description: Retrieve system uptime to ESMC with agent

    Detail: Send system uptime with ESMC Agent to ESMC so that this can be used for Dynamic group (or task eventually). For example a dynamic group with all computers with uptime more than X hours. That would allow to run task on those computers.

    Even better, just send this information from agent to ESMC everytime he reports to it. And add this information in computer "Details" and maybe as a column in "Computers".

  5. 10 hours ago, BobLongworth said:

    Description: ERA Agent update push

    Detail: It would be great if the ESET Agent itself could be updated via the ERA. Like it scheduled a job on the workstation to run the ESET Agent Live installer to install the latest Agent

     

    Description: ERA + Endpoint Encryption Server

    Detail: It would be great to have a single web gui to manage both the ERA and EES

    It's counterintuitive right now, but you can update Agent from ECMS, I had a same problem.

     

  6. 2 minutes ago, igi008 said:

    Hello @kapela86, many thanks for the clarification. Yes, we will try to extend "OS Service pack" field also for WIN 10 and Server 2016/2019. Very good suggestion, many thanks for it.
    I was also interested if it will be useful for you to have the option to filter all OS version instead of a concrete one. I mean something like operator "IS NOT".  E.G., I would like to filter all Windows 10 computers that are not on the latest version, which is 2004.

    Well, I don't use filters that much, I can just sort list by this column.

  7. 2 hours ago, igi008 said:

    Hello @kapela86, thank you very much for your suggestions. It really helps us to improve our products.
    One question to recommendation #3. What is your primary use case? Do you also want to filter based on this new column?

    Now we have column "OS VERSION" and based on this table https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-information/, it would be possible to find a specific version also now. However, I am guessing that you want to filter for expme all Windows 10 computers, which are not on the latest version. Is my assumption correct, or your primary use case is different?

    Many Thanks

    Well, I just want to see if it's 1909, 2004, etc, I don't know about other people. For Win7 it shows "Service pack 1" so for Win10 and Server 2016/2019 it should show mojor build number since they are somehow like service packs. Regarding your filter question, there is already a filter for OS SERVICE PACK so I don't really understand your question.

  8. Few Changes with columns on "Computers" page

    On "Computers" page, can you change a few things:

    1. COMPUTER NAME column: right now it shows FQDN followed by internal IP address. Can you add an option to hide IP address? OR add separate columns like this:

    a) hostname without IP

    b) FQDN without IP

    c) hostname with local IP

    d) FQDN with local IP

    e) hostname with remote IP

    f) FQDN with remote IP

    2. REMOTE HOST column: change name to REMOTE IP since it shows IP address. And add a proper REMOTE HOST column that will show FQDN (or revDNS, or a separate column with revDNS since it can be different from FQDN)

    3. OS SERVICE PACK column: with Windows 10 and Server 2016/2019 let it show a proper version, eg 1903, 1909, 2004.

  9. Recently I tested Endpoint Security install on a laptop that will be used outside our network. Just for testing, I forwared port 2222 of ESMC on our gateway (to some other nonstandard port) so it is accessible from internet. I then created custom installer and in "Server hostname" and "Port" I put our external IP and that custom port. I connected that laptop to our mobile router (and disconnected from our wifi), installed it and it connected to ESMC and everything seemd ok. But one thing was weird, "IP Address" shown in Computers and in Details was not external IP of that latop, it was an internal one. I don't know if this qualifies as bug or feature request, but can you change it so it reports correct external address?

×
×
  • Create New...