Jump to content

Wolf Igmc4

Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Kudos

  1. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 received kudos from persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    Add a behavior blocker, based on the reputation system of Eset. Yes, I said this some time ago, but if Eset don't add it, in the future, this will be a big problem. 
  2. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 received kudos from persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    That's a good suggestion.
  3. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 gave kudos to persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    Suggestion: Reputation scan
    A costume scan that scans the whole hard drive with live grid and gets reputations for everything(Dll, Exe,...) on the machine.
  4. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 received kudos from persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    ESET have sandbox, but we just can't access it. But I agree with you, I want to manage apps in a sandbox.
  5. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 gave kudos to persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    What about a sandbox? I guess it is much important than Anti-Theft I'm still waiting to see a purge button for not existing Rules in both Hips and firewall.
    Also showing the command line when Hips alert for cmd!and provide a way to submit the FP from the Gui, not email :|
    Also an option to let us sort the rules based on the directory.

     
  6. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 received kudos from persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    You can add a vulnerability detection module, and something like the USB vacinne of Panda.
  7. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 gave kudos to persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    Can ESET force the Hips to work like an Anti-EXE? I tired a lot of sample with Hips in interactive but because the Exe file could run the final system status is infected...the problem is hips won't react in execution.
    Even with Hips in interactive mode, the process will run(if Eset fails to detect it by sig or whatever it has)and it will remain in the process but can't do anything malicious because hips alert you.
    Would be good if we let this hips jump on Executable files
     
  8. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 gave kudos to persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    Eset needs to update the Hips module and make it work like this:
    If a command wants to run via the cmd then Hips(in interactive mode)must show that command line for the user.
    I mean not only show an access alert for the cmd also show the command itself and let the user see the command and then ask to allow or block it.
    Also, provide an option to add our safe command lines to the Hips rules.
    Im sorry for my bad English but I guess you know what I mean.
     
  9. Upvote
    Wolf Igmc4 gave kudos to persian-boy in Future changes to ESET Internet Security and ESET Smart Security Premium   
    Whats up?
    Can we have this feature?or should I rely on my Rehips for cmd? I'm happy because no one cares about this hips
×
×
  • Create New...